Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Primary Concerns: Coaching & Defensive Playmakers


davos

Recommended Posts

After another tough outing that should have been a win, I really believe the key to becoming more consistent and improving involves two big things

*note: If we can keep asinine posts to a minimum that would be great :patriot:

So again, here are my two biggest beefs:

-Better Coaching-

I know this will be a sensitive issue because its way too early to fully judge Rivera and many here will just hate me for even questioning him, but I'll be honest and say I'm just not a fan of his style so far as a head coach.

He may be honest in pressers and has a great history as a defensive coach, but he just doesn't seem like a long term HC in all honesty. Even with our injuries on defense, I'm stunned how far our D has dropped this season. I didn't expect us to contend (at all) this year, but our team lacks discipline around the board whether it be keeping our rotations in check, limiting penalties (after we know its been a problem), to tackling in general.

Just to clarify, I'm not saying he needs to go. Rivera is a very sound type who doesn't bullsh*t around and has his head on straight. His character makes him tolerable in the eyes of the fans, but I just don't want to be stuck in another situation where we are at the cusp of something great but just can't make the leap.

-Obtaining a Defensive Play-maker-

This would be my personal target because our lack of turnovers is killing us. Whether it be using the rest of the season getting someone currently on our squad to become a turnover/ball hawking machine or picking someone next year in the draft, getting a defensive playmaker is the top priority.

I don't even care what position. We need a Steve Smith type for the defense; meaning someone who can boost our intensity level at any given moment and keeps everyone in check. Yeah, Beason typically fills this role quite nicely but he's also the head of the defense. I want that slightly off the rails type who can become a turnover machine.

Bottom line is that we need better self-discipline and a defensive playmaker. What are your primary concerns going into the second half of the season you want to see improvement on?

Please don't take a sh8t in this thread.

Regards,

Beach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know its hard for some of you to grasp but it all starts up front. 3 of the 4 linemen are first time starters and 2 of them are rookies. Rivera cant stop the oline from blowing up the front and letting OL eat up our scrub LBs. There are allot of one on one battles being lost up front and there is no quick fix for that. Next year we look for help but this year its just going to be that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know its hard for some of you to grasp but it all starts up front. 3 of the 4 linemen are first time starters and 2 of them are rookies. Rivera cant stop the oline from blowing up the front and letting OL eat up our scrub LBs. There are allot of one on one battles being lost up front and there is no quick fix for that. Next year we look for help but this year its just going to be that way.

So who cut all the vets? The fact that we start two rookies is easy to understand, as is the concept that they'll make mistakes. But this year, starting two rookies is a choice that was made deliberately by the current staff, not by an annoyed owner who was trying to force a coach to quit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell, all in all I think our D played pretty well. When we started going 3 and out and putting them back on the field is when they really started to bog down. Considering we basically gave 2 less than 30 yard touchdowns, they only scored 10 points. AP was held "mostly" in check the entire game. We actually played the best run defense yet this year. Just the lapses as always killed us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the defense isn't going to be great. Rivera doesn't have the players on defense to exactly make his scheme (an attacking defense) work. I think he's done fine with what we've got there.

I think we'll have a much better look at it next year when he has a full offseason to get the players to fit his scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the OP, I agree we need defensive playmakers. Beason coming back is not enough.

When you have guys like Thomas Williams and Jason Phillips playing significant snaps, you know there is a shortage of talent on the defensive side of the ball.

It is too early to make a judgement on the coaching staff. My biggest complaint from a coaching/front office standpoint is our decision to go into the season relying on 2 rookie DTs. That made no sense to me then and it makes no sense to me now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So who cut all the vets? The fact that we start two rookies is easy to understand, as is the concept that they'll make mistakes. But this year, starting two rookies is a choice that was made deliberately by the current staff, not by an annoyed owner who was trying to force a coach to quit.

What other choice did they have? Ron Edwards went down in TC and there was not another DT available with his talent. What was left was a DT that was suspended for 3 games and a DT with major shoulder problems. Its not like we ignored the problem its just that there is no good solution to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...