Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would Cam be successful on past Panther teams?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

He likely would have done well under Henning's offense. With Moose in his prime, a young Smith, Steven Davis pounding it, the roided up OL and that defense. It would have been fun.

Not that it wasn't....that was the most fun season to watch in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretend Cam Newton was QB on these past Panther squads.

Would...

'01 Panthers go 1-15?

'03 Panthers go to the Superbowl?

'06 Panthers, a preseason pick to win the Superbowl, have lived up to expectations?

Yea they would probably have been 0-16 with Cam starting, becauase he was only like ten years old . :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm, no guys.

John fox was our coach in 03 and 06, we'd be unning the ball 50 times per game, cam included.

great canned answer

However, the question wasn't about how much the team would run but weather or not Cam would be successful. Both of Smith and Muhammad put up monster years under that run 50 times a game offense. Henning's offense was Corryell as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...