Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Chud leaves and we promote Shula to OC...


Zod

Recommended Posts

All hope will be lost. Please god no.

That's very close to my nightmare scenario. Shula is a capable QB coach but I have absolutely zero faith that he could step in and run an offense that could even compete with this one, let alone one that would equal this success.

If Chud takes a job elsewhere I'm sacrificing every farm animal I can think of that we bring in someone from the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we are running a coryell+

quite a few things in the playbook that was added to the coryell. i don't see norv as being the creative mind needed to take the team forward.

it would have to be someone younger and more creative, imo.

plus, i can't see norv wanting to take a job as an assistant to his old assistant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on................................??

Are you pointing that towards me? I'm not sure what you're asking. I can say that if you look at Norv Turner's history (ie: Success in Dallas and San Diego), he knows a thing or two about the same offense Chud runs, which would be a smooth transition if Chud decides to be a HC.

And I'm not sure why Norv wouldn't want to come to a team under a man he helped develop while he's in the twilight of his career and have large amounts of freedom with a deadly offense.

All of this is just based on whether Chud decides to leave or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure we would replace him with a very good and similar OC. Even if it is a good up and coming one that nobody has heard much of. We aren't just going to settle for someone. They will only hire someone for the position that is equally creative and agressive as Chud. I would imagine a lot of OCs would want to come here because of Cam and all that they could do with our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...