Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tired of the Kirkpatrick hype.


Yaboychris28

Recommended Posts

Dre Kirkpatrick is rated the 22nd best player on Mel Kipers big board. I'm not saying that kiper is always right but his job is to watch film and evaluate players. With dre's size and speed, he has to have some reason why he is rated that low. (lack of coverage skills maybe?) All I am sying is that I don't think we should take him with our first pick. The prospect that will help us the most is Luke Kuechly. He is by far the best LB in this 2012 draft class. He is a tackling machine with size and speed. Kuechly led the nation with tackles by a marigin of 45. Thats my 2 cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're using one draft board as evidence that hes over hyped? Where do the rest of the respectable mockers have him?

Scouts Inc. has him at #8 as a 95, tied with RGIII and Reiff, just 1 below Claiborne, Coples, Richardson (with a 96). Kalil has a 97 and luck has a 99.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kirkpatrick is a decent-to-good CB and a potential pro-bowl type FS. Personally, I don't think he's worth a top ten pick.

That said, I'd take Kirkpatrick all day over Kuechly. He's stuck at MLB in a 4-3 and fug moving Beason again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can think about when I see and here talk about taking luke kuechly is ,dan connor takling numbers are overrated really dan connor all time takling leader in pennstate history translating to mediocre lb in the nfl Dre Kirkpatrick would be a great pick for us at 8/9 we need speed at the olb spot lukekuechly doesn't fit the mold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, no I’m not going to panic when he got 2 Qs and looked great in 1 and looked not great in another (let’s not mention the drop).    Yeah we finally have a team that would be considered average offensively around him. Let’s roll this season. 
    • The woe is me everything but Bryce sucks mantra is stale af my friend. Look nobody here is going to argue with the fact Frank Reich was not a good head coach. At the same time. Bryce Young is now in his second season with his second coaching staff and a handpicked young offensive head coach who has been known for working with QB's such as Baker and Geno. As far as the offensive pieces around Bryce we have the 4th highest salary cap allocation (that might be even higher now after the new Moton deal) dedicated to the OL in the entire league. We have 2 first round WR's one of them 8th overall the first time we've ever selected a WR that high in franchise history. And the fact of the matter is Bryce Young did not have a good preseason. It's not the first time it's happened either. We all hope to see he and the rest of the team flip a switch in week 1. But we should all be able to agree that the offensive performances we've seen from the entire QB room (Bryce included) in preseason was simply unacceptable.
    • We have seen Bryce play… what… 9 games with AT BEST what one would consider NFL average WRs? You just can’t see the forest for the trees and keep going back to your lazy take of revisionist history.    he looked AWFUL Y1 with the worst coaching I’ve ever seen in the NFL and one of the weakest WR rooms I can recall. He looked awful first half of y2 and great second half of y2 with average coaching and average skill position. I don’t know where this elite talent argument even comes from. 
×
×
  • Create New...