Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's worth trading up for at 8/9?


davos

Recommended Posts

?

A lot of trade discussion around these parts and I'm wondering what would actually make someone behind us want to trade up.

Possibilities:

Richardson falls...which team needs a RB the most?

Floyd or Alshon have ridiculously good combines making them more sought after. I could see the Titans & Browns as good partners. A lot of guys we've been discussing may be available around 20 when all is said and done.

I've seen Tannehill being propped up *cough*Walterfootball and just don't see a team reaching for a QB like last year. That's wishful thinking on some mocker's parts. I think if anything, the Skins are gonna be the team to trade up to the #2 spot for RG3.

Any other guys that may emerge will probably be a need for us and I'd like to see us get since we're looking at a plethora of positions...WLB, DT, FS, CB, & OT.

What looks interesting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood15

Seattle trading up for Tannehill.

Cardinals/Eagles moving up for falling OL or WR.

Bengals making a move for a starting OT or OG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after last year teams are going to be MORE willing to trade up for a QB. A lot of teams are probably wishing they had traded back into the 1st to get Dalton before Cincinnati got him. And people are probably thinking that the Ponder selection wasn't as big of a bust as they thought it was going to be. He was much more solid than I thought he was going to be. Even Locker wasn't as bad as expected. Only Gabbert was a disappointment.

Another name being brought up for possible mid first round consideration is Brock Orweiller (or something like that) from Arizona St. Not everyone is hyping him, but I've seen him mentioned a few times as a surprise sleeper to find his way into the 1st. He's like 6'8 and supposedly has a strong and pretty accurate arm and surprisingly mobile for a guy his size (doesn't have the statue label that Mallett had).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after last year teams are going to be MORE willing to trade up for a QB. A lot of teams are probably wishing they had traded back into the 1st to get Dalton before Cincinnati got him. And people are probably thinking that the Ponder selection wasn't as big of a bust as they thought it was going to be. He was much more solid than I thought he was going to be. Even Locker wasn't as bad as expected. Only Gabbert was a disappointment.

Another name being brought up for possible mid first round consideration is Brock Orweiller (or something like that) from Arizona St. Not everyone is hyping him, but I've seen him mentioned a few times as a surprise sleeper to find his way into the 1st. He's like 6'8 and supposedly has a strong and pretty accurate arm and surprisingly mobile for a guy his size (doesn't have the statue label that Mallett had).

That's a good argument for why team's may want a QB. rep

Like you said, it looks like Locker and Ponder weren't the out-of-place picks as it seemed during last years draft which may get teams thinking QB early...but we're only talking Washington, Cleveland, & Seattle imo. The Dolphins will probably stick with Moore and the Chiefs will probably give Cassel one more year...but those teams are still maybes for QB.

If the Browns don't ****** RG3 with their first pick, I could see them trading up to get ahead of Seattle, KC, & Miami. We're in a good spot for that. Pick 22 would be right around Jenkins, Floyd, Dennard, Poe, Barron, etc.

A trade this year will more likely occur if a team wants a specific player and I don't see many non-QBs beyond pick 5 that will garner that attention over the rest. Maybe like I said Richardson & Jeffery but most other guys that would fit that bill are needs.

I'm therefore completely in support of a trade if a team comes to us but not us on the offering side of the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to look at it on about 3 levels.

First, the coin flip will determine a lot. For instance, if we get the 8 pick, right in front of Miami, who needs a RT and 3-4 OLB, then you look to see if there could be a great one fall to us like Rieff. If the Panthers don't take him (which they should consider), then you look at others who desparately need one like the Cards. Lots of things have to fall in place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like some have said, it's a QB league. dont be surprised if the 3rd QB gets pushed up people boards and teams start calling to make a move. i think thats why FO's go throught so many different situations in case things like that happen. if you dont have a guy at the QB spot, you go get him at any cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to look at it on about 3 levels.

First, the coin flip will determine a lot. For instance, if we get the 8 pick, right in front of Miami, who needs a RT and 3-4 OLB, then you look to see if there could be a great one fall to us like Rieff. If the Panthers don't take him (which they should consider), then you look at others who desparately need one like the Cards. Lots of things have to fall in place

I've read Miami is switching to a 4-3. Which means they probably need to draft guys for that more than anything (most notably, a true 4-3 DE). I think Miami takes Coples if he's there, if not THEY may try to trade back to get better value out of Ingram or Mercilus or someone like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...