Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Floyd In


Peppermint9030

Recommended Posts

Catching some grief from the Defensive Tackle with the first crowd yet? I agree Floyd is gonna make some team very happy. I think his value is right where we are picking and don't understand those saying if he slips to the second we will take him. Matter of fact could see someone trade up for him. The 49ers and the Bears are looking for a real deal numero uno WR and the Eagles are looking for DeSean "Sideline Cancer" Jackson's replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after blackmon there is a clump of about 4 or 5 WRs without a lot of seperation. floyd is right in the middle of that clump.

I disagree with ya Rayzor. Imagine that. In my opinion there are only three possible Elite WR's. Blackmon, Wright and Floyd. Sanu, Jones, Randle, and the rest will not be able to come right in and produce like the Top Three. There is a definite gulf between the two groups.

Matter of fact i think its the DT class that has very little separation in talent. With no Suh or Dareus scouts have inflated the value of Brockers and Still. If i may i would like to rank the DT's imo.

1a. Brockers

1b. Still

1c. Brandon Thompson

2a. Jerel Worthy

2b. Fletcher Cox

3a. Dontari Poe

3b. Josh Chapman

See what i did there? Too much comparable talent to reach. Tier 1 are the all around guys with the most upside. Tier 2 are the pass rush and McLain competition. Last but not least Chapman and Poe are insurance if Edwards comes back less that 100% and or Fua does not step up. Then again i feel that drafting two last year, the emergence of Neblett, and the return of Edwards makes this a potential logjam on the depth chart and ultimately a wasted pick.

Just my opinion but Poe, Chapman, and my pick Mike Martin of Michigan could all come in a contribute on our team or any other team just as well as Brockers or Still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Catching some grief from the Defensive Tackle with the first crowd yet? I agree Floyd is gonna make some team very happy. I think his value is right where we are picking and don't understand those saying if he slips to the second we will take him. Matter of fact could see someone trade up for him. The 49ers and the Bears are looking for a real deal numero uno WR and the Eagles are looking for DeSean "Sideline Cancer" Jackson's replacement.

Tarheels fan, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are you talking about DTs?

i thought this was a discussion of Floyd and WRs.

i think this is a very good class of WRs. sorry if you don't agree with me that there isn't much seperation between those WRs. i just don't see it. it's not knocking floyd. i he's one of the best in a very good and deep class.

i think any of floyd, jeffery, wright, sanu and randle can come in right away and do well starting. i don't mess around with ranking these guys because i think they are all massively talented and a lot of it depends on the situation they go to. i could even see all these guys taken in the first round. i expect that there will be at least 4 WRs taken in the first.

WRs are coming out better prepared for the pro level just like QBs are. i wouldn't be a bit surprised to see all those guys and a couple other rookie WRs starting by the season's end.

as far as us drafting a WR in the first...no question i'm not a fan of that idea because i think that fixing the D is the biggest priority. go BPA on D is what i suggest. i just happen to see that brockers can be that elite talent that you look for that early. quite a few people agree with me on that. if blackmon miraculously falls to us somehow then we take him, but that won't happen. same with kalil. same with claiborne.

i'm not singularly focused on DT. i just think that if brockers is as good as advertised then he could make the biggest positive difference out of anyone aside from those few i listed. if we trade back i'm available to more options.

by not taking a WR that early, we might miss out on a very talented prospect later, but the same can be said for lots of positions.

just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...