Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would ya'll do this?


Panthers4lyfe

Recommended Posts

Just thinking on my part... What if brockers was there with our #9 pick and we took him, and then it gets later in the 1st round, say 23/24, and janoris jenkins is there and say Marty Hurney offers our 1st next year and 4th rounder this year and we take Janoris Jenkins.. and come the 2nd round we take Stephen Hill. I would do that in a HEARTBEAT because to me jenkins looks to be a potential stud with a bad background... our team would look like this

QB- Cam Newton

RB- D-Will, J-Stew

FB- Richie Brockel

WR-Steve Smith, Brandon Lafell

WR-Stephen Hill, David Gettis(in no order, start who deserves it)

TE-Greg Olsen, Jeremy Shockey

T-Jordan Gross

G-Geoff Schwarz

C-Ryan Kalil

G-Jeff Hangartener

T-Jeff Otah/Byron Bell

DE-Charles Johnson

DT-Michael Brockers

DT-Ron Edwards

DE-Greg Hardy

LB-James Anderson

LB-Jon Beason

LB-Thomas Davis/Jordan Senn

CB-Janoris Jenkins

CB-Chris Gamble

FS-Sherrod Martin(we need to sign a starter)

SS-Charles Godfrey

that would make us so much better and i would feel comfortable not having a 1st next year with these guys in the fold. what yall think? just curious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell no, stop trading away our future. You're just getting turned on by the draft prospects too easily my man..

if he is available, and our FO likes him enough i don't see why we wouldn't do it... it's not like we're giving our draft for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool. You want a WR based on one day's performance. Never mind looking back at his college career which was pretty much non-existent, since GT runs the triple option and rarely throws the ball. If you're gonna draft a receiver, get someone who is proven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...