Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kendall Reyes

jarhead

By jarhead,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

Reiff looked like our pizza delivery boy, but some OL look like that and are studs.

Brockers has a huge wingspan, but he is really no more ready to play NFL DT than Tannehill is to play QB. Maybe down the road.

I am really thinking, with the Giants super bowl and all, DEs will go fast. We could be taking one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

Didn't Warren Sapp, and Richard Seymor have low rep numbers on the bench? I might be wrong thoe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

why are you such a Brockers hater?

i knoe people who dont even play football 21 years old benching 225 30+ reps.

once brockers hit the NFL, team will make sure he gets his strength straighten out. its not all about being able to rep 30+ to be able to get to the qb. its about technique and skills , getting off blocks. having strengths is a qudo but not major.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
klumme Enthusiast

klumme

Posted
Posted

The people who doubt Brockers strenght really should put on his tape. That dude is a beast. He got 35" arms while a guy like Poe got 32" you dont have to be a world champ in bench to realize how big a different that makes.

The problem for us is he does not look very athletic and thus you have to ask yourself if he can be a great passrusher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DamnItJake!
      EVERYONE UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IN YOUR PROFILE

      By DamnItJake! · Posted

      The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • KillerKat
       Carolina Hurricanes vs.Vegas Golden Knights  (Stanley Cup Final Game 1) | ESPN on ABC Tuesday, June 2 | 8:00 PM

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...