Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garay Re-Signs With San Diego


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Why are you guys acting like we had money to sign him anyways? The fact that we haven't brought any DTs in though, makes me really think they are confident they will be getting a DT in the draft. I fully expect that to happen.

I'm sure he wasn't expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's s shame. I dug his hair and some more vet presence at DT would have been nice. I guess this means we're for sure going D-line 1st or 2nd round.

Or that Rivera was ACTUALLY SERIOUS when he has said over and over that he does not view DT as an area of concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or that Rivera was ACTUALLY SERIOUS when he has said over and over that he does not view DT as an area of concern.

I know he said that but, I find it hard to believe he was serious. I mean he said before the combine that we needed help pretty much all over on defense and not much has changed since then. Perhaps he meant that DT wasn't an area of concern relative to CB2 or Will depth? I don't know, I just don't think we'll go into the season with Edwards and Fua/McClain starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

between the return of edwards and beason, and then davis, and a full NFL offseason for fua and mcclain, and kearse's end-of-season shining, and the assured addition of a starting cornerback to the team, i'm not convinced we're in huge trouble without adding garay or some other FA defensive tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have to stop making everything about BY. They will and have been bringing in players to improve the TEAM, not just Bryce Young. Which is something they should have done BEFORE bringing in a rookie QB. Even Metchie is a generally good pickup at a position of need. He just happens to have played with BY in college. And that doesn't hurt his chances or the team's. Morgan just addressed the biggest areas of need on the team via free agency so they won't be reaching for a position of need in the draft. He's legit picking the best player available for the TEAM in the draft. The o-line was in shambles in 2023. He addressed it in 2024. The d-line was in shambles in 2024. He addressed it in 2025. The pass rush and linebackers were in shambles in 2025. He's addressed it in 2026. Unfortunately good young WRs don't hit the FA market, so can't just throw money at them. You have to draft them. I wonder what some would be saying if they'd spent the amount of cap on the offense that they spent on the defense in 2025 and 2026 - and then used both first round draft picks on defense. Would that have been better in your eyes? No. You would be complaining that the defense is too young to compete and more vets weren't brought in because they're trying to prop up BY. This team should be talented enough now to make some noise in the South. If BY is actually holding them back, then QB will be addressed in 2027. They benched him 2 games into their tenure and you think they're tied to his success. No. That doesn't compute. They're tied to the team's success. BY could throw for 5000 yards and if they're 4 - 13, head's will roll.  TLDR: Their decisions aren't driven by making BY look good. They're trying to improve the team and win games. Period. 
    • I still firmly believe that Tepper still has his mandate of make Bryce work or get fired and because of that, it doesn't matter how badly he does... He'll get a long term deal in the 40-50m range and set back this franchise for a decade. Then the Teppers will have another QB infatuation and maybe they get it right then. 
×
×
  • Create New...