Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Brockers!


rippadonn

Recommended Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxk88nb4zhQ&feature=relmfu

My hope is that you will all have to get used to the name. We need that "monster" in the middle and this is the guy. 54 tackles, 10TFL, 2 sacks, 1FF, 1 Blocked kick. 6'6" 322lbs(combine).

Panther Nation this is the true "monster" in this draft #90 of LSU.

Big up to the remaining members of the Michael Brockers band wagon! Keep hope alive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After watching some tape, this guy gets double teamed almost every play.

Unless we trade down, I have a feeling we will draft Brockers then a CB in the second which im thinking will be Hosley.

Although a better scenario would be trade down and draft Kirkpatrick and get lucky and have Worthy fall to us in the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont mind having Brockers, not at #9 though, late 1st or early 2nd and I'm all in.

Good thing about this draft is the depth at DT and CB. The bad thing is that since Poe has fallen in the rankings recently that puts Brockers and Cox front and center as the best DT's in the draft.

Brockers will not make it past 12-13 and may just go #6 overall. This guy is a prize in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...