Marty Hurney Apparently Lied About Fletcher Cox

[Ivan The Awesome]

What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?

[Riverboat Ron]

It's looking more and more like Cox will be our pick. To be honest I'd be happy with Ingram, Coples or Cox at #9 and maybe Brockers if we trade down.

[KendrickPanther]

There's no way I'm watching 10 minutes of nothing but Cox on youtube. Just tell me one thing, is he stiff or fluid?

[ZeroZeroSeven]

What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?

I would do all of the above to Ms. Dehar.

[KendrickPanther]

What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?

Woa not the kind of Cox I want on my team.

[cultclassiccat]

Premier edge rusher to help Johnson would be nice. Hardy is good but is he elite?

[panthers55]

Premier edge rusher to help Johnson would be nice. Hardy is good but is he elite?

If we want a premier edge rusher then Cox would not be the guy at all.

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

This thread is starting to get a little uncomfortable.

[Lout]

If they pick Cox, then they are admitting that Rivera and Hurney blew it with McClain last year. You don't draft a guy at the 65th pick in the draft and then redraft another the next year unless you have a situation like we did with Clausen. Even then Newton was the number 1 pick in the draft and had huge upside. Cox really doesn't. Now if we had a chance to draft a Suh which is the DT version of Newton, then you do it in a heartbeat. I can't see where Cox provides so much more than a guy we can get in the second round. It we want pass rush both Ingram and Coples bring more to the table by far. At least with Williams and Stewart they waiting 2 years.

Cox had 5 sacks last year and 4 of those were in 2 games. (South Carolina and Kentucky) and 1 against Wake Forest. The other 9 games he had none. Add that he had a total of 3 quarterback hurries and you see a guy who pressured or got to the quarterback a total of 8 times in 12 games. Hardly the terrific pass rusher people are making him out to be.

Funny that Coples had 7.5 sacks and he is considered lazy and unmotivated but Cox has 5 and he has a high motor and never quits.

When you look at all our choices you get the sense that there is not that much to choose from really. Ingram brings the most to the table and by many accounts will be gone when we pick at 9.

It's cool that you don't like Cox as our top pick and all, but at least support it with factual information. C'mon man, I don't know where you pulled this statistic from, but I counted 30 QB pressures in just 3 games I looked at.. the guy probably had 80 QB pressures on the year.

[jarhead]

If they pick Cox, then they are admitting that Rivera and Hurney blew it with McClain last year. You don't draft a guy at the 65th pick in the draft and then redraft another the next year unless you have a situation like we did with Clausen. Even then Newton was the number 1 pick in the draft and had huge upside. Cox really doesn't. Now if we had a chance to draft a Suh which is the DT version of Newton, then you do it in a heartbeat. I can't see where Cox provides so much more than a guy we can get in the second round. It we want pass rush both Ingram and Coples bring more to the table by far. At least with Williams and Stewart they waiting 2 years.

Cox had 5 sacks last year and 4 of those were in 2 games. (South Carolina and Kentucky) and 1 against Wake Forest. The other 9 games he had none. Add that he had a total of 3 quarterback hurries and you see a guy who pressured or got to the quarterback a total of 8 times in 12 games. Hardly the terrific pass rusher people are making him out to be.

Funny that Coples had 7.5 sacks and he is considered lazy and unmotivated but Cox has 5 and he has a high motor and never quits.

When you look at all our choices you get the sense that there is not that much to choose from really. Ingram brings the most to the table and by many accounts will be gone when we pick at 9.

The choices may be there but are not obvious to me.There is just not that dominate pass rusher in this years draft that is a 3 down player.No Von Miller in this years draft

[CRA]

The choices may be there but are not obvious to me.There is just not that dominate pass rusher in this years draft that is a 3 down player.No Von Miller in this years draft

Good thing for us is that we need help doing just about everything on D....

[cultclassiccat]

Panther55 ..i should've said instead of dt maybe de. I guess it all depends on the type defense we will run. We still have Edwards and Mclain/Fua and Keiser. All are still looking to make an impact on the team. Hogan is our #2, is it good to have one more with falcons and bucs doubling down on their recievers? I think so. I look at our first two picks as starting def picks. But i have no insider knowledge or "sources", strictly opinion.

[SmootsDaddy89]

I wonder how many players would be excited by the idea of playing with cox.

[bigskypanthersguy]

I like calling the d-line The Penetrators, should this pick happen.