Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera And Hurney Meetings With Coples Again


TylerVagyler

Recommended Posts

We would be foolish NOT to check him out as often as possible. If we take him, then I feel pumped because Marty is good in the first. If this were a smokescreen, Marty and RR would not be there together. They are trying to come to a decision.

I do not know why Coples is trashed and Poe is glorified by some on here. Coples is a lot better prospect. If they think they can keep fire under his butt, then what a weapon. He can play outside on running situations (and if they pass, that is OK too--he showed at the SR bowl what he can do) and he has the size and experience to kick inside to DT.

He covers 2 needs if they decide he is the one.

Remember, at UNC he was a 21 year old kid with a scandal hanging over the program. He was never given a real shot to learn a position and refine technique. Finally, his stats were pretty good.

He scares me and probably scares them, which is why they are there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coples give RIvera to be very creative with his defensive fronts.

Also, Coples has the ability to drop in zone coverage in zone blitz. Even though I would rarely do it, it would be a nice wrinkle.

One of the most versatile lineman in the draft.

Also, if successful we could get premium DE production for relatively cheap costs. Compare the price for Elite players at certain positions, DE would be one of the best Value postion to draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera and Hunrey have shown that if they decide he is their guy they don't care how much of a supposed risk they are. They won't pick him unless they are sure. Rivera said he wanted a pass rush but Hurney said it would be a safe pick which seems somewhat contradictory. This sounds like he is on their short list but we all know that they won;t know for sure who is there or who they want until they actually pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Cosell's short breakdown:

Struggled with Coples on tape as a special talent. At his best a power/leverage player. Saw him as less athletic Carlos Dunlap. Better at DT

I trust him, and his tape watching.

I would prefer Claiborne, Cox, Floyd, or Gilmore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coples is my pick and I feel he's been the front runner for some time. As I said yesterday, moving down to get him really isn't an option-because teams don't overrate ridiculous character flaws like Mike Mayock does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coples could be a home run pick but he could also be a huge bust. A high risk high reward player isn't what I want at the #9 pick. I would rather trade back to around 15ish. There will be plenty of great players available still at 15 and I would feel better about Coples at 15. I feel like this meeting is more to try and make teams believe we are high on Coples to entice a trade than us being that high on Coples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smartest realistic pick, but I think he will be gone before 9.

still with the "drive" and "commitment" questions? ...ridiculous

cox will be a good player but not sure our current depth at DT warrants such a high pick

trading back is not an option when you advertise for months that that is what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Cosell's short breakdown:

Struggled with Coples on tape as a special talent. At his best a power/leverage player. Saw him as less athletic Carlos Dunlap. Better at DT

I trust him, and his tape watching.

I would prefer Claiborne, Cox, Floyd, or Gilmore.

Cosell also has a top five of:

1-RG3

2-Luck

3-Gilmore

4-Richardson

5-Jenkins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Cosell's short breakdown:

Struggled with Coples on tape as a special talent. At his best a power/leverage player. Saw him as less athletic Carlos Dunlap. Better at DT

I trust him, and his tape watching.

I would prefer Claiborne, Cox, Floyd, or Gilmore.

I trust Hurney and Rivera more, They have much more at stake and will do the due diligence. If they pick him, they are sure he is right for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My unbelievable pile is touching the moon now-a-days. Bill is ultra control freak if there was ever one in the NFL, he's the guy. He stayed off SM and hate hate hated the media..........(wow bill what did you do in 2024??!?!?!).  So this guy, 100% control freak, just gave away all his SM to a 24 year old?? He doesn't understand SM at all... This is the same level as 8 time SB winner coming to coach UNC, after all this NIL BS that drove out his other control freak coaching friends.  This time line is insane. 
    • Unless its 2021 renfrow, Moore is 30, jimmy horn was picked 208 in a weak draft.... I mean they just rid of Clowney cause of number of snaps, so Moore could follow that. NFL is unforgiving missing a full year and deal with disease is very hard to over come.  The only locks are- Tmac, XL, AT. Coker is close, but if he shows up in poor shape, he could be cut.  If horn wins the 5th, all George has to do is show he's more valuable than the listed above. renfrow could be a PS guy as he continues to get back in NFL shape. Moore has been on like 8 teams and just a fine fit with the Dave system.  I mean for the first time in I don't know when, there is a real battle to make the #4-#6 WR room. It's good to cut good players...  Lastly who knows, one or two injuries hit and George easily makes the 53. I got him currently as the #6. 4 others are right there too, I heard Dave say Kobe Hudson name during a presser. He's in the mix too. 
×
×
  • Create New...