Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More Bounty Gate Evidence/denial (New Details)


TruCatzFan

  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Did Vilma ever use his own Money to fund a bounty?

    • Yes
      27
    • No
      3
    • Maybe
      7
    • Who gives a fug, burn him to the ground
      16


Recommended Posts

On the one hand, it seems clear, on the other hand, there's some room for doubt and believing the Saints*' source. In the end, it makes Vilma look guilty as hell that he didn't visit with the League Officials when he had the opportunity.

Here's the link for the rest of the story. i cut excerpts for those too lazy to click a link:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7886385/counsel-mary-jo-white-says-nfl-bounty-evidence-vs-new-orleans-Saints*-strong

NEW YORK -- A former U.S. attorney hired by the NFL to evaluate its investigation of the New Orleans Saints*' bounty program said Thursday the evidence shows players received payments for hits on targeted opponents. Mary Jo White said in a conference call that evidence in the league's investigation of the three-year, pay-for-pain system provided "an unusually strong record" and came from people with "firsthand knowledge and corroborated by documentation."

"The factual basis for the sanctions is quite strong in my opinion," she said. "You must safeguard the identity of people that provide information to you in order to protect them, and also to encourage others in the future to come forward with evidence of wrongdoing. This is certainly not a one-on-one, he-said, she-said record at all. This is multiple independent sources."

A Saints* source who testified during the league's investigation told ESPN's Ed Werder Wednesday that he believed the league's findings are exaggerated. The source said that while the report said the program existed for three seasons, it was limited to playoff games in the Superdome against Arizona and Minnesota in 2009.

The source told Werder that the program began when former Saints* defensive coordinator Gregg Williams was concerned about creating a higher level of motivation for his defensive players as they prepared for the postseason.

Before a team meeting, Williams told Vilma that he had a plan, and that the coach provided Vilma with the $10,000 he offered to any teammate who knocked out quarterback Kurt Warner.

The source said Vilma returned the money to Williams following the meeting.

According to the source, Williams believed the financial reward created the proper defensive mindset. So Williams and Vilma repeated the scenario the next week before playing the Vikings and quarterback Brett Favre, who was the victim of several illegal hits and had to be helped from the field, but finished the game.

This is interesting to say the least. Whether you believe it or not is up to you... I personally don't believe poo that these guys are saying tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i thought you were rabidly against all this twelve hours ago because it couldn't be proven

You're so overly dramatic. My posts were calm and logically sound. Obviously, as usual, you read my posts, disagreed because you have tunnel vision, and now are trying to make me out to be a flip flopper, which I'm not. Posting anything directed towards you is pretty much a waste of time anyways. Consider this my last post directed towards you ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The e-mails between Mike Ornstein and Sean Payton were dated during the regular season this past year (see the Newton Bounty thread).

And of course, Anthony Hargrove confessed, in writing.

Either of those alone would tell you the "Saints* source" - quite possibly Vilma himself, or maybe someone like Roman Harper or Joe Vitt - is full of $#@&.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Scott was present in last nights thread and can easily back me up, that nothing I said was rabidly against it. I just wanted to SEE proof.

What little the League has divulged is already enough to make me a believer. Not just what the talkin heads have speculated on in the airwaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Scott was present in last nights thread and can easily back me up, that nothing I said was rabidly against it. I just wanted to SEE proof.

What little the League has divulged is already enough to make me a believer. Not just what the talkin heads have speculated on in the airwaves.

I understand your desire to see evidence...as we all would be interested. However, the league and Goodell does NOT owe the fans anything. This is a legal and ethical matter...not a public matter.

Work related matters and discipline are NEVER public matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People confessed that is happen including the one who organized it which was Greg Williams. Greg Williams is the only one taking his punishment like a man.

Hargrove confessed. NFL has many independent sources, not one, but many sources saying the similar thing that Vilma offered money. Give it a rest dude. Seriously. He did it. If he didn't do it, he should have been defending himself from day 1 when this story broke, not after his stupid ass gets suspended for a year. This is speculation but I believed Vilma thought he was going to get a few games, not a whole year. That's why his ass is talking and trying to defend himself.

If it was anyone on the Panthers, I would expect the same thing to happen to them. You don't go out on the football field to intentionally hurt someone. That's their occupation. That's there livelihood. That's how they provide for their family. That's how they put food on their table. That's how they provide for their kids. Then the Saints****** players have the audacity to go out and take that away from them and intentionally do it and hurt them and tear ACLs? fug the Saints******, fug their fans and fug that poo-hole of a city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Scott was present in last nights thread and can easily back me up, that nothing I said was rabidly against it. I just wanted to SEE proof.

What little the League has divulged is already enough to make me a believer. Not just what the talkin heads have speculated on in the airwaves.

You were rabidly against it to the point of flooding the thread with spam and pieing/repping breezing2thesuperbowl repeatedly because you agreed with him. You demanded evidence and were provided with it several times, but continued denying until someone finally exposed your juvenile behavior, and you changed your opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You were rabidly against it to the point of flooding the thread with spam and pieing/repping breezing2thesuperbowl repeatedly because you agreed with him. You demanded evidence and were provided with it several times, but continued denying until someone finally exposed your juvenile behavior, and you changed your opinion.

He doesn't believe in tweets from people who work from the NFL..he wanted a link. Dude is a troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nola.com/Saints*/app/492751/nflpa-counsel-response-to-nfl-conference-call.html

In response to the conference call the NFL organized Thursday morning with Mary Jo White, a New York litigator and former federal prosecutor, the players' union released a statement from its outside counsel, Richard Smith. Smith is also a former prosecutor.

"I was at the meeting with the NFL's lead investigators in March. She was

not there. Anyone, especially former prosecutors like both of us, know

that what the league provided could never be called 'substantial evidence'

of player participation in a pay-to-injure program. Worse yet, Mary Jo

provided nothing new or compelling today beyond another press briefing. My

guess is that a veteran FBI agent like Joe Hummel would agree as well."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...