Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No minority head coaches were hired with 8 openings


Deebo

Recommended Posts

When is this mentality going to change in the NFL.....its 2013 and we still dont give minority coaches a chance....currently there are 4 minority coaches out of 32....even with superbowls wins and appearance by black head coaches and GMs

thoughts fellas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm in support of the rooney rule. i think it's important in a good-ol'-boy structure (which fits NFL owners to a tee) to make sure there are systems in place to eradicate any leftover prejudices from an era where that sort of thing was a social norm and accepted behavior.

however, given the diversity of minorities in head coaching and front office positions around the league, i'd say this is an anomaly. i'm open to being challenged otherwise, but i don't think there's anything to see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If black players dominate the league, it is not because they are black, it is because the talent evaluators feel that they give the team the best chance to win. The same talent evaluators select the coaches. The coach that give the team the best chance to win is hired--if he is black, white, or hispanic. I would hope that a minority would want a job because he is the most qualified, not because some stupid quota forced a team to hire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nfl already made a statement.

Here's what NFL Exec VP of Human Resources Robert Gulliver had to say in reaction to questions about the league's hiring practices for head coaches and GMs: "While there has been full compliance with the interview requirements of the Rooney Rule and we wish the new head coaches and general managers much success, the hiring results this year have been unexpected and reflect a disappointing lack of diversity. The Rooney Rule has been a valuable tool in expanding diversity and inclusion in hiring practices, but there is more work to do, especially around increasing and strengthening the pipeline of diverse candidates for head coach and senior football executive positions. We have already started the process of developing a plan for additional steps that will better ensure more diversity and inclusion on a regular basis in our hiring results. We look forward to discussing these steps with our advisers to ensure that our employment, development and equal opportunity programs are both robust and successful."

about 4 hours ago

NFL statement on hiring practices: http://sulia.com/channel/football/f/fe1f7b52-2df4-47ef-a9a9-0383bfab4122/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If black players dominate the league, it is not because they are black, it is because the talent evaluators feel that they give the team the best chance to win. The same talent evaluators select the coaches. The coach that give the team the best chance to win is hired--if he is black, white, or hispanic. I would hope that a minority would want a job because he is the most qualified, not because some stupid quota forced a team to hire him.

I agree with your main point but those players genetics do have a huge impact on their dominance and being black is a part of that. So I read "black" in these cases as "genetically gifted" knowing that skin color itself is irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i believe this is all bullshit. nfl coaching is a fraternity. they stick with who they know, and that's it. it has nothing to do with whether you are black or white. it has everything to do with who you know. breaking into the nfl in general is hard enough as it is unless you're a chick that wants to be in the public relations dept. on its face, it isn't racism; it's cronyism. if it has a disparate impact on minorities, it's because nfl organizations want to keep it "all in the family," so to speak, not because they want to keep minorities out.

whether or not having minority coaches is a good thing is another issue. i, for one, think it would be. but turning all this into a race relations stunt is ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm in support of the rooney rule. i think it's important in a good-ol'-boy structure (which fits NFL owners to a tee) to make sure there are systems in place to eradicate any leftover prejudices from an era where that sort of thing was a social norm and accepted behavior.

however, given the diversity of minorities in head coaching and front office positions around the league, i'd say this is an anomaly. i'm open to being challenged otherwise, but i don't think there's anything to see here.

This is about as real as you can get folks. For all the reasons you gave supporting the Rooney Rule are exactly the same reasons why i find it offensive and a joke. I'm an amputee, and if someone more qualified than I, were to be passed over for a position just so a company could say they hired the handicapped guy(while i would still take the job) I have to say i would feel ashamed as if i didn't earn my station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Harbaugh and Pete Carroll can coach. Teams will hire the best coach for the job. If there was a coach who was a minority who could coach like Harbaugh, Carroll or Belichik, he would be hired immediately.

Also I don't see why there is a discussion when too many coaches are white but you never here a discussion about too many players being black or too many owners being Jewish.

The word is 'minority'. It's not a surprise that a minority of the coaches are minorities.

I'm not going to bother researching it but I would guess there is accurate representation of minority coaches (compared to the population of the United States). I would also guess that the white coaches who have been hired recently have done a good job (Fox, Carroll, Harbaugh, Shanahan come to mind the past few years).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with your main point but those players genetics do have a huge impact on their dominance and being black is a part of that. So I read "black" in these cases as "genetically gifted" knowing that skin color itself is irrelevant.

some would say this statement is racist. all would say it is stereotyping. those same people are bitching about no minority head coaches being hired. you have to be careful deciding which side you're on, and subsequently how you argue that side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some would say this statement is racist. all would say it is stereotyping. those same people are bitching about no minority head coaches being hired. you have to be careful deciding which side you're on, and subsequently how you argue that side.

Racist as hatred? Or racist as in acknowledging genetic differences? Because I'm fairly certain I don't hate anyone for something that is far and away from something they could control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Racist as hatred? Or racist as in acknowledging genetic differences? Because I'm fairly certain I don't hate anyone for something that is far and away from something they could control.

yeah, i wasn't calling you racist. i was more just highlighting the ignorance of the people who are out there shouting from the rooftops that the nfl is racist. nothing personal. you just happen to illustrate a point i was trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, i wasn't calling you racist. i was more just highlighting the ignorance of the people who are out there shouting from the rooftops that the nfl is racist. nothing personal. you just happen to illustrate a point i was trying to make.

I see what you mean repped :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There are several posters that only post negative at all times.   8 wins is a big jump from 5 and we still have 2 games.  Jaguars have a much more talented roster than us and have underachieved for years. 
    • All of this noise is just setting us up to lose Week 18 and proclaim life's not fair. If there's one thing I know in my 30+ years of watching the Hornets and Panthers, is that the bad guy always wins in the end. A team can be falling apart internally but we will still lose to them. A team's fanbase can be extra shitty and cocky and they will just win anyway. It always happens
    • Well even if we took diverging paths getting there...our overall assessment of Shough is the same (bolded) lol so I guess that's what matters.  What you call "playing at a level that looks like a veteran starter" is the same thing I'm referencing when I talk about his poise.  Although I still wonder how truly "bad" of a team the Saints are.  Their defense is middle-of-the-road, and their offense does have some good pieces (Olave, Juwan Johnson) outside of running back which is the position most everyone agrees is relatively plug-and-play.  I'm not going to pretend to know anything about the majority of NFL team's o-lines lol but I'm assuming Saints are not great there, although Shough's pressure % seems to have been quite low (and steadily improving) over the last four weeks (20 -> 16.7 -> 15.0 -> 13.0) so maybe they've been playing better as of late, or perhaps Shough himself deserves credit for that.   Some of the language I'm hearing about Shough, including talking about how he's way above league average in several categories, makes it sound like Shough is having a rookie season on par with like a CJ Stroud who established himself as basically a Top 5-10 QB his rookie season.  Maybe that's on me though, I don't mean to attribute anything to you that I'm sure you don't agree with.
×
×
  • Create New...