Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why our special teams suck.


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

Brentson Buckner made a good point on WFNZ a few weeks ago.

He says that coaches and salary don't mean anything. It's all about the talent.

The best special teams units are made up of backup players (linebackers, RBs, etc) who are future starters just waiting for their turn. He named one team that had 10 special-teamers that all went on to become successful starters if I remember correctly.

When is the last time one of our special-teamers moved up to a legitimate starting roll. I'm sure there are some but the last one I recall is smitty.

I think for this reason we aren't going to have great special teams until we develop depth on our roster. We don't have that right now so I don't see us doing well on ST.

Just a theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are what happens we you build a team the Marty Hurney way.

We have gaping holes in our starting line up. We have zero depth. We have a plethora of failed draft picks on a team that refused to supplement ourselves with FA. We have over 100 million dollars in resources wasted up on meaningless positions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are what happens we you build a team the Marty Hurney way.

We have gaping holes in our starting line up. We have zero depth. We have a plethora of failed draft picks on a team that refused to supplement ourselves with FA. We have over 100 million dollars in resources wasted up on meaningless positions

so focused on not letting good players that you draft get away that you neglect holes left behind.

the more i think about how hurney threw money at his "core" when they had all that cap space available just pisses me off. just think about what they could have done had they not thrown so much of the cap at just a few guys that probably won't even be on the team in the next couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our coverage has been pretty damn good since Colin Jones arrived, it's the kicking, punting, and blocks on returns that needs improvement.

i think bruce dehaven will be able to help with a lot of that. the guy knows how to build and run good special teams units.

i disagree that coaching has nothing to do with it. investing more resources will help, but the guys should be better having someone with experience helping them prepare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole premise is stupid given that we not only had future starters on special teams but we had some starters on special teams. Guys like Gary Barnidge, Thomas Davis come to mind. We used a number of guys who were in the regular rotation on special teams.

agreed here.

one of the problems that we've had over the years is that we used STs as that place on the roster that we stuck guys without a starting gig. it didn't matter if they had ever done well on STs. it wasn't seen as a priority. some of the guys that we had were solid contributors elsewhere and/or vying for a starting gig.

we just haven't had good coaching or enough good ST players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
×
×
  • Create New...