Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gamble anxious to take on opposition's top receiver

scpanther22

By scpanther22,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

scpanther22 Mentor

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

he admits it was a frustrating day because he wanted to face Fitzgerald one-on-one.

“It was kind of frustrating, but you have to play what’s called,” Gamble said. “I wish I could have been on him… I felt like that game I wanted to play on him because I felt like they were going to go to him a lot. I was ready to play him.”

on the meeks DEF

I like it because you don’t have to think that much,” Gamble said. “You just go out and play fast and try to make plays. So I like it simple.”

http://www.carolinagrowl.com/Read.aspx?Story=1101

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Apprentice

bleys

Posted
Posted

I like it because you don’t have to think that much,” Gamble said. “You just go out and play fast and try to make plays. So I like it simple.”

damn, Fox still controlling poo as usual.. lmao..

I'm glad to see Gamble's confidence..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

“It was kind of frustrating, but you have to play what’s called,” Gamble said. “I wish I could have been on him… I felt like that game I wanted to play on him because I felt like they were going to go to him a lot. I was ready to play him.”

So glad that son of a b*tch Turdovac is gone

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersAlv Contributor

PanthersAlv

Posted
Posted

"I like it because you don’t have to think that much,” Gamble said. “You just go out and play fast and try to make plays. So I like it simple.”

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

That's what I keep saying.

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

And it looked like we were getting good results. Then the bye week where they must have starting installing more complexity and we go to hell in a handbag. Would be nice to know what took place. In the end though it probably doesn't matter since he is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
megadeth078 Newbie

megadeth078

Posted
Posted

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

Yup, then Fox and Trgo started throwing other poo in there during the bye week and cagged it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

Kinda too early to read into that cause we are just out of OTAs. I mean if your installing a new system you dont want to make it super hard to learn cause thats when you see a lag like in the second half of last year. Besides zone coverage is not all that hard for a CB if you think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...