Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tavon Austin Wonderlic score: 7

Kevin Greene

By Kevin Greene,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

A wonderlic score really measures your ability to think abstractly and reason sequentially. It also measures your speed of mental processing. It is related to some forms of intelligence but is surely not the only measure. I think that the chalkboard work they do with receivers as well as talking to his other coaches about how well he picked up plays and new concepts is a more valid measure of his football acumen. Should it be considered? Yes. Should it be a determining factor? Not really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jungleking Newbie

jungleking

Posted
Posted

when you have test anxiety or just don't test well, it doesn't matter how much you study for something, you're probably not going to do well. the more pressure put on that one test and having it be a timed test makes it worse.

fortunately the league as a whole doesn't put a whole lot of emphasis on this one test. i think people on the outside make more of it than the league does. if some teams/gms make it a big deal, their loss.

and i don't think it drops him at all. a team won't decide whether or not to take austin or patterson based on that silly thing. if they had any concerns whatsoever and any real interest in him, they would have brought him in for a visit, like we did...but deciding to take him at any spot? nah. unless they were nitpicking in the way they might in considering his vert or wingspan or something it's just not something that they are going to knock a guy on.

Obviously nobody's dropping him off of their board based on one test. But when you're comparing players, intelligence has a small part in the rankings. It's not dropping him a lot, and the score is combined with the impression that the player gives off during his meetings, but it matters some. Too many people are saying it doesn't matter at all. That's not true. Remember all the glowing stories about Kuechly and his intelligence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

Obviously nobody's dropping him off of their board based on one test. But when you're comparing players, intelligence has a small part in the rankings. It's not dropping him a lot, and the score is combined with the impression that the player gives off during his meetings, but it matters some. Too many people are saying it doesn't matter at all. That's not true. Remember all the glowing stories about Kuechly and his intelligence?

his football IQ.

and i don't think a test likened to the SAT has any bearing on a football player being able to do his job. i don't think it has much to do with intelligence. might he be dumb as a brick? maybe, but that test isn't something that should be taken too seriously in gauging that. it is not a good indicator of who can pick up a playbook and understand it. it doesn't show an ability to learn and comprehend what he needs to do as a player.

it does very little but show who can take an irelevant test well and who can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

posted this in another thread...

hakeem nicks-12

percy harvin-12

cj spiller-10

frank gore- 6

julio jones-15

adrian peterson-16

morris claiborne-4

chris johnson-10

donovan mcnabb-14

ray lewis-13

dan marino-15

and i'm not going to go through and list all the guys that aced the wonderlic who sucked. i will say that gabbert scored a 42, tho. and ryan leaf scored only one point lower than peyton manning (27 vs. 28).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
La Pantera Mentor

La Pantera

Posted
Posted

posted this in another thread...

hakeem nicks-12

percy harvin-12

cj spiller-10

frank gore- 6

julio jones-15

adrian peterson-16

morris claiborne-4

chris johnson-10

donovan mcnabb-14

ray lewis-13

dan marino-15

and i'm not going to go through and list all the guys that aced the wonderlic who sucked. i will say that gabbert scored a 42, tho. and ryan leaf scored only one point lower than peyton manning (27 vs. 28).

Yeah, and I bet most of the guys knocking Austin for his score, would jizzed if we could take MoClay right now. It all boils down to his size, not his intellect.

IDC if all he could say is 'me cach fooball, me run faz, me sorez tuchdownz' as long as he does just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Cam Jackson

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • SmokinwithWilly
      At this point its Sadiq or bust... A

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
    • Stumpy
      Canes vs Lightning 7pm

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
×
×
  • Create New...