Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yep, its Kenny Vaccaro


Zod

Recommended Posts

I have decided on my final prediction for a first round selection, and that is Kenny Vaccaro.

Everyone knows we have a huge need at free safety.

I have read lots of comparisons to pro bowler Eric Weddle, who Rivera coached in San Diego.

Vaccaro is extremely versatile, top notch in run support and a sure tackler (which was SEVERELY lacking last year).

It is much more difficult to find a solid safety in later rounds than it is finding a solid DT.

For these reasons, I am predicting Its Vaccaro.

May god have mercy on your souls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No no no we need a couple of DTs, you don't care much about your safeties if your DTs are playing well.

CJ, Short, Star, Hardy or Alexander this front four would be a nightmare for any offense.

And if they can make a hole in the first line they have a Beason, a Kuelchy and a Davis waiting for anything.

RIP QB/RB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if SF player is there and they offer their 1,2 and our 3rd back, do you take 3 dimes or a dollar.

How are some of you this retarded?

It is unfathomable that I have seen multiple people struggle with the math behind that statement.

God above help us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...