Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shula's offense taking shape


jtnc

Recommended Posts

 

CHARLOTTE – It took several weeks for the Panthers offense to get into gear and find its rhythm last season, and offensive coordinator Mike Shula is working to make sure that doesn't happen in 2013.
 
Shula spoke about the need to start fast as individuals and as a unit shortly after being promoted from quarterbacks coach to offensive coordinator in January, and he reiterated that message after the Panthers concluded minicamp.
 
"The biggest thing is the mindset of each guy not to wait on anyone else to get our offense jumpstarted," Shula said. "It's about taking it upon yourself to do that.
 
"We talk about not wasting any play, not wasting any meeting to get better. We try to make things game-like as much as we can in the offseason, even though we are in shorts. But you can build good habits."
 
In Shula's view, thinking fast translates into playing fast, and that's been a point of emphasis this offseason. The playbook's verbiage has been simplified to help that cause, but it doesn't mean the Panthers are sure to evolve into an up-tempo or no-huddle offense.
 
"Not necessarily," Shula said. "Execution is the No. 1 thing. How we do it? There are a lot of different ways to get there. We're working on those things.
 
"But we've got to be sharper and faster thinkers than the teams we're playing."
 
Shula said quarterback Cam Newton is a player who has improved his understanding of the game. He's also been impressed with Newton's drive for consistency before, during and after plays.
 
"Cam has made improvements every day," Shula said. "You are not going to be perfect, we all want to be every time we go out on the field, but the important thing at that position is the consistency.
 
"If things aren't right one play, forget about it, move on to the next one. Help your teammates be better around you. I think Cam has definitely made strides in those aspects."
 
Several of Newton's offensive teammates are locked in a heated competition to catch his passes.
 
The wide receiver position is currently a crowded one with free agent signings Domenik Hixon and Ted Ginn joining a group of young receivers trying to separate themselves from the pack.
 
"Guys understand that they have to step up if they are going to make the team – it's just a numbers game," Shula said. "As coaches, you try to create to competition so you get the best out of your players. Now, all these wide receivers that are competing have to take the next step."
 
Training camp is next, and Shula is eager to see his offensive vision come together when the players put on the pads.
 
"We are going to be a balanced offense for sure. We can do a lot of things, and we want to present that to the teams we're playing," Shula said. "The ability to establish the mindset that we want will come in training camp. We're looking forward to it."

 

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Shulas-offense-taking-shape-/da707d63-9249-44c3-ad2a-339c2de99f77

Can't wait!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main difference between Shula and Chud is the verbiage.

 

Shula will name a running play up the middle "Iso Right," whereas Chud would call the same play something like "24 Strong Left Handoff Right Running Back Quick Dive Right" or something stupid along those lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main difference between Shula and Chud is the verbiage.

 

Shula will name a running play up the middle "Iso Right," whereas Chud would call the same play something like "24 Strong Left Handoff Right Running Back Quick Dive Right" or something stupid along those lines.

 

Changing the verbiage is going to help us move faster.  Give Cam some time to read the defense.

 

My biggest difference is.  Chudz was so damn headstrong in the Read Option.  I felt Cam's frustration after the Giant game.  It obviously wasn't working like it did in 2011.   Why keep forcing it to work.  We had the tools to be a more conventional offense and still be a big play offense.  Running the offense out of the Read Option wasn't working. 

 

Once we made the change and had the RO as a play not a scheme we did much better.  Who knows what could have happened had he had our offense changed after the TB game.

 

Shula like the run, He'll use it to set up the pass and slide a Cam run in there to keep them honest.  I hope Shula is a better at game time adjustments than Chudz was. Cause Chudz stunk at in game adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Cam-detractors assume the lack of verbiage is because Newton possesses a low football IQ. This is the same guy who has learned and adapted to four different offensive schemes in the last six years.

Shula's offensive might actually be what the doctor ordered for Cam.

You are correct sir. It is those individuals that have the low football IQ.

Simplify the call in the huddle...minimizing the time spent there. That leaves more time at the LOS for Cam to read the defense and ensure the right play is called for the situation.

I love the balanced attack focus. We have the pieces to be a dangerous passing and running team. Throw in the dynamic aspect of Cam making plays with his legs and we are complete. We can exploit matchup a and dictate what we want to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chud not only ran most plays out of the pistol using the read option as a mainstay but he made the read option even more complicated which more decisions and options for Cam to make. Then he blamed Newton when he couldnt do it. Shula has not only simplified the verbiage but he has sinplified the options and allowed Newton to call audibles and run the scheme from what I can tell. Chud would have various options whiich would be run out of each formation and Cam had to make a number of reads on every play both before and during the play. Cam had too many decisions to make on every play which made him indecisive and slowed things down.Playing faster isn't just simplifying verbiage but simplifying concepts and simplifying various options so you can put everyone on the same page and allow Newton to audiblize instead of make the play account for every option and expect the players to all recognize the subtleties and make the adjustments on their own. In other words let Newton make the adjustments and get everyone on the same page instead of complicating the play options and expecting everyone to recognize what to do on their own. This difference is why early on last year Newton was supposed to not be allowed to call audibles and change the play and later on was allowed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Cam-detractors assume the lack of verbiage is because Newton possesses a low football IQ. This is the same guy who has learned and adapted to four different offensive schemes in the last six years.

Shula's offensive might actually be what the doctor ordered for Cam.

 

They don't ASSUME: This is how they want it to be, the only way they'd see it. Lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...