Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else notice....


Zod

Recommended Posts

I don't see it. Bell got a decent push on him and maintained position between him and Cam. Hardy was never within three feet of Cam

 

The second Bell dipped his left shoulder, he was beaten. Especially against a speedy pass-rusher. Zod's right, that was a sack, or at minimum, a pass disruption.

 

 

I guess my main question is, did anyone expect Bell to be able to handle LT duties? I certainly didn't. Factoring in the Kraken makes it look a whole lot worse for him there.

 

EDIT: I'm also keeping in mind, this is one play out of a whole bunch at practice. Every athlete has one or two of those... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy wasnt going to get there plain and simple. He wasn't close enough to reach Cam and at 240 lbs a hand isn't enough to bring him down anyway. Hardy's momentum was going 1 direction and Cam's was going another.Bell did exactly what he needed to do. Make the DE on the outside rush go past the quarterback who steps up in the pocket. Bell wasn't beaten at all. He did what he was supposed to do push him past the pocket and let the defenders momentum run him out of the play.

More importantly Cam didn't try to run or hold the ball. He felt the pressure stepped up and delivered a pass on the money to Edwards. On that play the offense clearly won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a game situation, so it's like trying to judge speed from a heat, where all the athlete has to do is go fast enough to make the final.

 

I liked seeing Edwards make that catch. I'm hearing that he's looking like a legit WR. He may make the team on actual merit this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...