Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers Cuts Thread...


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's not turning on Madden.

Byron Bell is not good. There is a backup tackle on someone's roster better than Bell. Munnerlyn is expendable at this point. He also could be helpful to a team in need of secondary help. I view a trade of this nature something similar to the Goodson for Campbell but hopefully with better results this time.

It's highly unlikely but was just a thought as I don't think we need 6 corners and he probably has the most trade clue aside from Norman who I would like to keep.

 

So we need to A.) find a team in need of secondary help so bad that they'd want a pint-sized slot corner, and B.) that team has to have a good to decent backup right tackle they're willing to give away, and C.) they'd have to be in a different division since intra-division trades are very rare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gettis hasn't shown me anything that would make me believe he could "stay healthy".

respectful but edwards has shown less healthy than gettis limited. he's great at fair catches and getting ran down. not to mention that awkward passing situation we do time to time. smh... he should go to.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we need to A.) find a team in need of secondary help so bad that they'd want a pint-sized slot corner, and B.) that team has to have a good to decent backup right tackle they're willing to give away, and C.) they'd have to be in a different division since intra-division trades are very rare.

A. The pint size corner is a legit nickel

B. if they need a bad enough would make sense

C. Oh no 3 of 31 other teams ruled out of the equation...not a big deal when there's 28 others.

D. I'm not spending Saturday night going back and forth with you on a random thought I posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><p>

someone is pissing person off this is funny

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...

 

QB:  Cam Newton, Derek Anderson

RB:  Deangelo Williams, Jonathan Stewart (PUP), Kenjon Barner, Armond Smith

FB:  Mike Tolbert, Richie Brockel

TE:  Greg Olsen, Ben Hartsock, Brandon Williams

WR: Steve Smith, Brandon Lafell, Ted Ginn, Dominik Hixon, Armanti Edwards

OL:  Jordan Gross, Amini Silatolu, Ryan Kalil, Travelle Wharton, Byron Bell, Garry Williams, Brian Folkerts, Jeff Byers, Nate Chandler, Chris Scott

 

DE:  Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy, Frank Alexander, Wes Horton, Mario Addison

DT:  Star Lotulelei, Dwan Edwards, Kawann Short, Colin Cole

LB:   Luke Kuechly, Thomas Davis, Jon Beason, AJ Klein, Jordan Senn, Chase Blackburn

CB:  Josh Norman, Josh Thomas, Captain Munnerlyn, DJ Moore, Melvin White, James Dockery

S:    Charles Godfrey, Mike Mitchell, Colin Jones, Haruki Nakamura 

 

K:  Graham Gano

P:  Brad Nortman

LS: JJ Jansen

 

 

Your 2013 Carolina Panthers 53 man roster

The Gettis cut is the only one that stings. I was really pulling for the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...