Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2011 worst draft in NFL history?


Zod

Recommended Posts

Give Hurney the #1 pick overall and he will nail it! The rest? All gone.

 

lol

 

Sadly, that happened more than once :(

 

Among Panther drafts, I'd say 2009 was the worst.  The only halfway decent we got out of that was a 7th rounder (Captain Munnerlyn).

 

Next worst is probably 2005.  Got Thomas davis and Geoff Hangartner, not much else.

 

What's really sad is that if you wanna try and name the "worst Panthers draft", there are a lot of contenders :(

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kuechly was drafted in 2012.

 

And even if they both came out the same year, how in the world could we have gotten Newton and Kuechly in the same draft? :unsure:

 

what he means is that the team never benefited from the 2011 draft outside of Cam so we still sucked which in turn got us a high draft pick which in turn got us kuechly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...