Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seattle: A "must" win?


MHS831

Recommended Posts

The first game of the season?  Is that possible?  I think it is as close to a "must win" as any first game I have ever seen.

 

Why? 

 

Imagine the reaction if the Panthers beat Seattle.  Compare it to another game/event.  It would be equivalent to a playoff victory around here.

 

The biggest problem with this team is actually how losing has rattled the fan base.  We started as a franchise by going to the NFC Championship during the second year.  We played in 3 NFC championship games and a Super Bowl during the team's first 10 years of existence.  We got spoiled.  Even after a couple down years, 2008 happened, and the team won 12 games, earned a bye and home field advantage for the playoffs.  Seems like decades ago.

 

Since then we had Jerry's pie chart, Marty's spending spree, Fox gets fired, rumors that the team was leaving for LA,  an a few double-digit loss seasons.  We watched the new hope, Rivera and company, give away game after game in the fourth quarter.  We watched other-colored jerseys fill our stadium week after week because the fans had reason to lose their commitment to the team--Jerry and Marty became distant and smug, morons whose decisions were ridiculed across the league.

 

Winning this game would wash away four years of humility and restore hope.  It has a ton to do with the atmosphere for the next home game, and players thrive on that positive energy. So does the economy.  So do I.  I am tired of trudging into work on Monday's following a loss wondering what about life is worth living, hoping to avoid the obnoxious co-worker from the North whose drive in featured a one-liner rehearsal designed to get me to take a swing at him.

 

Enough is enough.  I do not want a moral victory.  I am tired of watching Rivera's face on the sideline looking like a third grader at a spelling be who had just been asked to spell "psuedoantidisestablishmentarianism."   Man up, grab your boys by the pouch, and make a tough call.  Screw tomorrow and next week and next year.  Win NOW.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is incomplete.

 

Is the game tomorrow a "must win" to what end?

 

Is it a must win in terms of a winning season or playoff birth? Certainly not. If it were, Baltimore would be out of the hunt now.

 

Is it a must win to instill confidence in the minds and hearts of the fans who are hoping for not the same old story? Absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a "must-win" can't apply to the first game of the season. We're playing a team that by all rights should be better than us, and we have a historically awful game one.

That being said, a win would be really nice, and could go a long way to boosting the confidence of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox wasn't fired - his contract was allowed to expire. And there is a difference between a sense of urgency and a 'must-win'. The team absolutely needs to play with urgency and intent, but implying that a loss on Sunday ruins the entire season is melodramatic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on how you look at it.  If the Panthers lose, I know people will say the Buffalo game is a must win.  So, is the second game of the season a...

 

Part of the point is this:  There will not be a realistic opportunity for a late season turnaround. 

 

Yes, mathematically, it is not.  However, what a loss would do to the fan  base is a different issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only issue I have with a "must win" logic to the first game is that it suggests that a loss ends all hope, and we know it doesn't.  Having said that, it would be huge for this team and fanbase to get this win, bigger than any other season opener I can remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think tomorrow's game is a must win for Seattle. The have San Fran next week and with a loss to us they could be looking at 0-2. Statistics show playoff chances are slim after that kind of start.

If we lose we have buffalo next week and if we can't beat buffalo well this season is over anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...