Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers - Bills Gameday Thread

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted

Cam was the only thing that changed in the last drive. He made better decisions(getting rid of the ball when nothing was there), he had better pocket awareness, he stepped into his throws.....

Because the Bills didn't have time to sub and was running the same formation. The receivers were also getting separation on that drive, making decisions easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

What changed is the playcalling. Quick throws, no slow developing routes.

 

 

Yea something we should have done since the first QT. Shula is gong to non adjust Rivera right out of a job. Im still sticking with 9-7 at best but its looking like a sheer climb to that goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boondock Newbie

boondock

Posted
Posted

This team has to change their lack of energy on game-days. Our energy suck especially on offense. They come out and play like oh it's just another game, we're going to run what we run and if it works great we probably win... if not it's just another typical lost. No, change the energy and pace

 

IMO it's like that because our coach demeanor and energy is like that. The team always take the attitude of its coach 

 

Coaching goes a long way in the demeanor and energy of the team. I will say though; that the last drive was crucial in turning this game around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

But that's what we should be doing anyway... Slants, drags, screens, quick outs, then hit them with verticals, posts, corners, etc. have to set them up. Also, the coaches need to see that uptempo offenses aren't inherently evil.

They actually work to your advantage as it did for us in the last two mins. The less time you take to get the playcall in, set the play up, get lined up, and run it, the less time you give the defense to key on things and make adjustments.

 

so you're saying that if my OL sucks and most of weapons suck that i shouldn't consistently run plays that are totally and completely dependent on their ability and should perhaps scheme to mask those weaknesses

 

 

well i mean duh why aren't we doing this any good coa...

 

 

 

oh

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
footballisasport Newbie

footballisasport

Posted
Posted

I swear if the Panthers start winning consistantly, I seriously don't believe some of you would know what to do with yourselves because u seem to love wearing your doom and gloom glasses long before the damn games are even over.

 

Panthers down 3 points in the second quarter...Game is over. Oh my Gosh, Cam isn't doing something right!!! Game is over.

 

In the meantime...Zod always seems to be doing his best Mike Mayock impersonation when it comes to Cam. Cam is over/under throwing..Cam is not setting his feet....Cam is not stepping into the pocket.... Cam is not fill-in-the blank. While accepting mediocrity from the rest of the team. 

 

Oh wait...The Panthers are now up by four. But there is still lots of time left for you doom and gloom folks to continue playing couch analysts of this game.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boondock Newbie

boondock

Posted
Posted

Yea something we should have done since the first QT. Shula is gong to non adjust Rivera right out of a job. Im still sticking with 9-7 at best but its looking like a sheer climb to that goal.

 

Shula over adjusted the first half of this game. After not taking deep throws and opening up the playbook against Seattle, he did it on just about every single play in the first half; which did not allow Cam and Co. to get into a rhythm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

In the meantime...Zod always seems to be doing his best Mike Mayock impersonation when it comes to Cam. Cam is over/under throwing..Cam is not setting his feet....Cam is not stepping into the pocket.... Cam is not fill-in-the blank. While accepting mediocrity from the rest of the team. 

 

lolwut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • Tr3ach
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...