Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norman sucks


Floppin

Recommended Posts

I'm sorry but Norman sucks ass. He had 4 ints in preseason so what. Two of those were jumped slant routes that had the ball not actually be thrown would have resulted in a blown coverage and the other two were horribly thrown balls that missed their intended targets by about 15 feet each and Norman's retarded ass happened to be playing off his man that much for whatever reason. 

 

Today when he came in, his presence was immediately felt, in a bad way. He gave up pass after pass. Including getting absolutely ate up on a dig route that left him about 20 yards behind his man. 

 

Guess who blew the coverage on that last TD that gave the Bills the win? Well fuging Norman of course. For some inexplicable reason he decided to try and jump the route on the slot receiver who was already covered by Thomas Davis and left his man WIDE fuging OPEN in the corner of the endzone.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hard to argue with this... josh was certainly staggering around lost in the final play! However we already knew our secondary was a problem. Our problems are much bigger than Josh Norman, the foolish have been brainwashed into thinking players like Armanti Edwards will bring success. Let's cut the crap and the coaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than Thomas. Rivera is a bitch for soft coverage.

 

 

Don't single him out. Nobody was close to the receivers the entire game. It wasn't just him.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

Ya'll either are blind, or you don't actually pay attention. Norman's coverage was BY FAR the worst out of any of our secondary players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than Thomas. Rivera is a bitch for soft coverage.

Thomas is better. Which is why he starts. Thomas at least is physical at the line....which is why Norman constantly gets abused with the short stuff. Neither are good once downfield in coverage.

Easy edge for Thomas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than Thomas. Rivera is a bitch for soft coverage.

And what happened after Thomas exited the game. Up to that point Stevie Johnson had like 3 catches for 15 yards. Ill go back and chart the play by play but the receivers went ham after Thomas left the game. If you want to make an argument back it up with some tangible evidence. It will make you a little more credible than just using the word "sucks"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...