Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norman sucks


Floppin

Recommended Posts

I'm sorry but Norman sucks ass. He had 4 ints in preseason so what. Two of those were jumped slant routes that had the ball not actually be thrown would have resulted in a blown coverage and the other two were horribly thrown balls that missed their intended targets by about 15 feet each and Norman's retarded ass happened to be playing off his man that much for whatever reason. 

 

Today when he came in, his presence was immediately felt, in a bad way. He gave up pass after pass. Including getting absolutely ate up on a dig route that left him about 20 yards behind his man. 

 

Guess who blew the coverage on that last TD that gave the Bills the win? Well fuging Norman of course. For some inexplicable reason he decided to try and jump the route on the slot receiver who was already covered by Thomas Davis and left his man WIDE fuging OPEN in the corner of the endzone.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hard to argue with this... josh was certainly staggering around lost in the final play! However we already knew our secondary was a problem. Our problems are much bigger than Josh Norman, the foolish have been brainwashed into thinking players like Armanti Edwards will bring success. Let's cut the crap and the coaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than Thomas. Rivera is a bitch for soft coverage.

 

 

Don't single him out. Nobody was close to the receivers the entire game. It wasn't just him.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

Ya'll either are blind, or you don't actually pay attention. Norman's coverage was BY FAR the worst out of any of our secondary players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than Thomas. Rivera is a bitch for soft coverage.

Thomas is better. Which is why he starts. Thomas at least is physical at the line....which is why Norman constantly gets abused with the short stuff. Neither are good once downfield in coverage.

Easy edge for Thomas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than Thomas. Rivera is a bitch for soft coverage.

And what happened after Thomas exited the game. Up to that point Stevie Johnson had like 3 catches for 15 yards. Ill go back and chart the play by play but the receivers went ham after Thomas left the game. If you want to make an argument back it up with some tangible evidence. It will make you a little more credible than just using the word "sucks"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...