Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thinking outside the box: Let's see if Lombardi/Chud will part with Flash Gordon


top dawg

Recommended Posts

While looking over Mike Holmgen's reaction to the T-Rich trade, like the autistic child character in Mercury Rising could sniff out codes and patterns, my mind zeroed in on one particular part of the article:

 

According to The Plain Dealer, Banner and general manager Mike Lombardi wouldn't have drafted Josh Gordon with a supplemental pick in 2012. That decision wiped away Cleveland's second-round choice in this year's draft.

 

 

I wonder if Lombardi and Banner would be willing to part with Josh Gordon for a price. I mean, they are rebuilding and all, and are probably not enamored with Gordon's off-field antics.  The question with Gordon has never been about his ability. He put up more than 800 yards and 5 TDs after effectively being out of football for two years.  In short, he really has the potential to be a real beast in this league. A real beast of Johnson, Bryant, Green and Jones proportions.  Thinking outside the box, what would you think about making a move for Flash Gordon? What's he worth now that he has pretty much proven that he is a big play NFL receiver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gordon has criminal tendencies and is an arrest away from being suspended multiple games. He was basically kicked out of Baylor because of drugs, and is quickly wearing out his welcome for a team that may be worse off for WRs than the Panthers. 

 

This franchise, currently, is in a very fragile state. We don't need any players like this adding to the distractions and disappointments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know why everyone now automatically assumes that the Browns are having a firesale now. They traded Richardson because they know that Chuds offense doesnt effectively use a RB. They made a decision that a 2014 first round pick was more valuable than a running back that was on pace for 800 some yards this season. Chud clearly likes WR's and needs them, and he also wont want to get rid of a franchise LT. We would have to look for underutilized pieces of the Browns team that we could pick up if thats what we were looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know why everyone now automatically assumes that the Browns are having a firesale now. They traded Richardson because they know that Chuds offense doesnt effectively use a RB. They made a decision that a 2014 first round pick was more valuable than a running back that was on pace for 800 some yards this season. Chud clearly likes WR's and needs them, and he also wont want to get rid of a franchise LT. We would have to look for underutilized pieces of the Browns team that we could pick up if thats what we were looking for.

 

Banner and Lombardi aren't apparently enamored with Gordon. Strike while there are still feelings of discontent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 years old, 6'3" 225 and a 40 time in the sub 4.4 range.... I'd give up a 3rd or 4th for him.  The first number out there is the part that I think is most directly related to his issues.  Put someone like Smitty and Olsen in his ear and with a franchise/town that isn't Cleveland and we could have our future stud WR.  We suck in the 3rd & 4th traditionally, so it's no more of a gamble than Kugbila, Adams, etc.  I'd still go get Nicks, cut the rest of the underachievers, and keep Ginn/Gettis as our #4 next year..... Give Cam a serious arsenal going into '14.  Plus, we can go OT, CB/S with our first two picks.

 

Gordon

Nicks

Smitty

Olsen

Barner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...