Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kraken turned down an offer?


MtnJax

Recommended Posts

We can franchise him, but Hurney keeps screwing us from the unemployment line.  Yes, CJ has (arguably) earned his $$, but at the time he was a 1-hit wonder and we had only one team interested in him--cap-strapped Atlanta.  We could have offered him about $8 million per year and sealed the deal. 

 

Alexander needs to play.  If we do not re-sign Hardy, we can bring in a top WR or a few top OL.  We have bigger needs than DE, even if Hardy is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think Hardy is valuable, but not at $12 million per season.  DEs are great, but yesterday, Hardy was against a backup LT.  Crickets. 

 

Charles Johnson

Frank Alexander

Wes Horton

Mario Addison

 

---not bad if they continue to get better--remember, Johnson and Hardy were not great their first two years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know teams have been selling out to stop the run, but Ricos kind of fallen off a cliff.. not sure if hes hurt or just worn down but even when theres a hole he doesnt look anything like he did those few weeks prior.
    • nah, that's basically saying people can't call a spade a spade.  Which is crazy.  89 is not a good dude.  He might have done a couple good things but it will never erase what he has proven to be in front of the world.  I tell my kid all the time not to view celebrity athletes as anything but people that play a sport well.  Lot of garbage humans play on Sunday.   And you have no clue who the good guys actually are.  PR in today's world is also powerful.  There was a window when Deshawn Watson checked every good guy box that could ever existed from the public's perspective.  
    • Some folks say it's because teams are playing more shell defenses preventing more longer passes.  The analytics folks would rather you pass for 7 years every down.  As you state, the crop of QBs is mixed as far as quality. I think when you put it all together, it's a recipe for less passing yards.
×
×
  • Create New...