Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Fabiano, Are you even trying?


CatfanMO

Recommended Posts

Ok, So Im looking through his list of Start em or Sit em for this week. I look through the QBs, No Cam Newton. Well Im starting him anyways as I think he is starting to play better. So RBs, No Panthers. WRs, No Panthers. RB and WRs I can kind of understand. So I look at the defense tab just knowing Carolina is a start em....NOPE. You would think a documented top 5 defense playing a rook QB and RB, would be an automatic start. COME ON MAN! There was just no mention of the panthers anywhere.

 

http://www.nfl.com/fantasyfootball/story/0ap2000000268075/article/start-em-sit-em-quarterbacks-for-week-8

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

even after he takes the time to explain why he picks who he picks, you still don't understand why?

 

remove the blind homer glasses and read it again.

 

He did not explain anythign about the panthers. I have been starting the Carolina D for weeks now. They are top 5 in scoring. Nothing else needs explained. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Obvious fantasy starters like Aaron Rodgers and Adrian Peterson will not be featured."

 

 

 

I think Cam qualifies as an obvious starter.  He is consistently ranked in the top 5 of fantasy quarterback projections.

 

 

Maybe even Carolina defense/ST is an obvious start as well.

 

 

 

I think that article is more of a "guys on the fence" advice column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did not explain anythign about the panthers. I have been starting the Carolina D for weeks now. They are top 5 in scoring. Nothing else needs explained. 

 

it's obvious all you did was scan for anything panther related, and got upset when you didn't see anything obvious.

 

this may help you out...For your final lineup decisions, check our lineup rankings.

 

it's from the very same article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Obvious fantasy starters like Aaron Rodgers and Adrian Peterson will not be featured."

I think Cam qualifies as an obvious starter. He is consistently ranked in the top 5 of fantasy quarterback projections.

Maybe even Carolina defense/ST is an obvious start as well.

I think that article is more of a "guys on the fence" advice column.

Get that common sense outta here!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually.. he did mention a Panthers WR: Smitty

 

Owners beware - Steve Smith at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Thurs.): To put it lightly, Smith has not done well against the Buccaneers in recent seasons. He hasn't scored a touchdown against them in the last five meetings, and has posted 80-plus yards just once in his last eight games versus Tampa Bay. Smith could also see a lot of CB Darrelle Revis(Maximum value: High WR3)

 

There ya go.. feel better now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...