Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So we win 8 straight, lose to Saints in NO on SNF like everyone else in history, now we're suddenly worried about Jets?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

And people say *I* am pessimistic? Guys, we're playing Geno Smith on Sunday. Literally Geno Smith. GENO. SMITH. Are you going to sit there and tell me the Jets have a better than decent chance of beating us with Geno Smith at quarterback against our defense?

 

So many people in this fan base are overreacting. Was it not just last week that the Saints were blown out in a primetime game on the road against a very good team? Remind me, did the Saints manage to bounce back Sunday night or not?

 

If the Jets score more than 10 points, it should be considered an upset. Panthers 27, Jets 9

 

You've been negative most of the season. We've been winning most of the season. You were positive this past week. We lost.

Please be negative again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm back to "got to see it to believe it" mode.

 

had we kept it close, i'd feel better.

 

yes, we should win this one. we should blow them out. the defense should eat geno alive.our offense should score more than enough points to win. but how many games over the past few years have we been in that situation where we play a team that we should win only to fall.

 

rivera could be getting nervous and start coaching scared and taking fewer chances (like we saw last week). the players could have lost their confidence after last week and fallen back into the mindset where they are just waiting for what is the next thing to go wrong. shula might have run into a wall with his playcalling. 

 

and the jets might turn things around and choose our week to be the thing that they pull it all together and start their run.  we might see geno get replaced and us unable to stop his replacement.

 

all these things have happened before, in fact it's been more the norm around here than any winning streaks of any length.

 

should we be nervous? maybe not, but after the past few years i don't think you can blame anyone for having doubts.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unfortunately, the last game is what people remember the most.  all message boards are the same, the ceiling crashes after almost every loss and fans can't see their team winning another game.

 

the jets can apply more pressure than the Saints did on defense but their offense is poo.  they are capable of beating us but I see us coming out on top unless we are just too flat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm back to "got to see it to believe it" mode.

had we kept it close, i'd feel better.

yes, we should win this one. we should blow them out. the defense should eat geno alive.our offense should score more than enough points to win. but how many games over the past few years have we been in that situation where we play a team that we should win only to fall.

rivera could be getting nervous and start coaching scared and taking fewer chances (like we saw last week). the players could have lost their confidence after last week and fallen back into the mindset where they are just waiting for what is the next thing to go wrong. shula might have run into a wall with his playcalling.

and the jets might turn things around and choose our week to be the thing that they pull it all together and start their run. we might see geno get replaced and us unable to stop his replacement.

all these things have happened before, in fact it's been more the norm around here than any winning streaks of any length.

should we be nervous? maybe not, but after the past few years i don't think you can blame anyone for having doubts.

Rivera looked like old Ron, stoic on the sidelines with no answers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you guys are worried about the Jets, have you packed it up for this season? If you think the Jets have a solid chance of beating us, then you must think the Saints will beat us the week after that right? 3 game losing streak? We traditionally struggle in Atlanta too, so you think we're going to end the season on a 4 game skid and likely miss the playoffs? Hey, it must be time for us to jump on the Fire Rivera bandwagon again then too right?

 

All this because we lost to a Hall of Fame QB in his prime in a spot and time where he's undefeated in his career. SMH

 

The Jets scored 26 points on the Saints to beat them. Anyone see them scoring 26 points on us? Give me a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we'll lose, but i can give you the formula for a Jet victory...

 

We turn the ball over repeatedly.

 

We do that, and give them easy scoring opportunities, and they can beat us with their defense. I expect a low scoring Panthers victory, but we have to take care of the ball. The Jet's offense can't beat us if we don't make multiple mistakes. It's really as simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first person to say trap game gets bant.....

From my birthday party in a few weeks.

 

So we're all invited? Awesome!!! ;)

 

Geno Smith is no Drew Brees. Brees ate Kuechly & our DB's for dinner in that game, getting the ball out in 3 sec or less. Smith will not have the same skills. I see a big TOP advantage to our favor. The offense will be similar to the SF game.

 

More points than the other guy. Enough to win. That's all I ask.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...