Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy says he wouldn't mind franchise tag


Jmac

Recommended Posts

A second? Hardy has transformed into an elite DE and he's still very young. Greg is not just a pass rusher. He punishes RBs without mercy too. The Kraken will only fetch a first rounder. DEs of his caliber are rare, essential premiums.

He ain't going anywhere though. G-Man values his hog mollies.

 

Sorry, but some of the money our beloved Kraken is gonna want is gonna have to go to Cam and Kuechly.

 

It's just business, and it sucks, but it's how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A second? Hardy has transformed into an elite DE and he's still very young. Greg is not just a pass rusher. He punishes RBs without mercy too. The Kraken will only fetch a first rounder. DEs of his caliber are rare, essential premiums.

He ain't going anywhere though. G-Man values his hog mollies.

We have too much money in RB's to sign Hardy and extend Cam. Not to mention, Gross is on his last year of his deal and guys like Mike Mitchell, Graham Gano, are FA's this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We better never sign any RB to a huge contract again, especially after seeing what rookies have been doing the last few yrs. 

 

There's no excuse to have cap problems when we don't even have any franchise players signed to big contracts.  Our best players are playing for pennies, while we have easily replaceable players hogging the cap. 

 

They better find a way to re-sign Hardy, no excuses.  I don't want to hear about picks, or trades, that's a crap shoot.  We have him, and we are in the driver's seat.  Get it done.  If we are who we wish to be, a championship caliber team with a championship caliber defensive unit we'll always have our players. 

 

The Ravens had multiple pro bowl stars every year on their defensive unit, never lost anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJ is going to make 8.75 million next year, 9.75 the next, and 10.75 in 2016. 

 

That's around the framework I would expect Hardy to want/sign for. CJ also got the huge signing bonus though, so Gettleman is going to have to get creative to frame Hardy's contract in a way that doesn't murder us either next year, or down the road if the contract is back loaded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Franchise would be the worst situation for us. That would only benefit us if we intend to trade him. There is no way we can afford to try and payout two big contracts and take the cap hit at the end of 2014 season with both Cam and Hardy. The only reason I'm not worried about Cam's contract next year is we really don't have any big contracts to renew and Beason's dead money expires. The only way Hardy stays is to do some restructuring of other contracts. The 8M offered to him was a great offer based on our current situation, it would have left about 8-10M for us for resigns and draft picks. We need to restructure Godfrey and Stewerts contracts ASAP while we have some leverage on them with other players playing well in their respective positions. It wouldn't hurt to try and restructure Smitty and even CJs again. That way we can offer Hardy more like the 12M a yr he is looking for. It's really not normal to do so much restructuring but that's the only way to get out of this mess, Gman knows this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see DG being the UnHurney and getting a deal done.

He was there when the Giants got Tuck signed for 5 yrs 30 million on an extension. I love CJ...don't get me wrong but no player other than the QB or a Calvin Johnson type WR deserves 72 million. Teams are starting to wise up to that fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...