Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Huddle question....possible offensive game plans utilizing strengths and cover weaknesses


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Game is two days away and it looks like Stewart will be able to go as well as Smitty (on a limited basis I would guess,definitely not 100 %). So they have a season of games under their belts and we have seen the capabilites of our backs ( Stewart not so much), and our wide receivers (with and without # 89). Question is the best way to include Stewart to create positive yards and the wide receivers to cover for Smith and his injury. Please no Madden crazy ass plays and so forth. Climb inside Shulas brain and rework the connections to add something to our game plan that will put points on the board without upsetting the balance of run and pass.Defense needs little help but the offense needs to produce now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart will come in to give tolbert a break if needed, i dont see him having more than 8 snaps.

 

Smitty will be effective with ginn, lafell, or olsen clearing out the safety or corner and probably running slants, outs, comebacks and option routes. i dont see him getting loose down the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think part of the national media's concern with us is our receivers and Smitty not being 100%. It's just time for our receivers to step up and secure the ball.

 

Lafell is due and there's no reason not to give it his all now...I expect a 150 yard game from him. Ginn will stretch out the field with a couple of big plays but really it's up to our RB making some catches, Olsen finding some seams/out patterns and Lafell delivering his best game of the season.

 

And Smitty gets a TD because he wants one.

 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart's first game back he immediately saw a big role this year.

Then against SF he was a bigger part of the gameplan.

I expect Stewart to again get a nice load this week. His style suits the game.

Nothing suggests a healthy enough to play 28 will be limited

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GB were moving the ball with lacys power running so Tolbert is the best bet, and big plays weren't needed in that game Nelson Cobb and Jones got enough space to complete short to medium gains on drives, it was only GBs failure in the redzone that made us play these douchebags on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me crazy but I think Hixon sees the field this week more than ever.  I think we will do some 4 wides and less play action.   Last time we did a ton of play action and it didn't work.  Sunday I think we throw more to open up the run instead of run all day to set up the pass.  Let newton throw early and get into a rhythm.  Screens, reverses, slants and more quick hitting plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GB were moving the ball with lacys power running so Tolbert is the best bet, and big plays weren't needed in that game Nelson Cobb and Jones got enough space to complete short to medium gains on drives, it was only GBs failure in the redzone that made us play these douchebags on Sunday.

  

Screens to Jstew.

I think doses of both would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...