Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it just me, or do most of the FA this year other's overpriced trash


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

For one, there are no QBs, so teams that need one will reach and overpay. The receivers we talk about are nothing special, but b/c they've been on Sportscenter or fantasy teams, their asking price will be high (Eric Decker for instance). The same can be said for corners, as a lot of names stick out that were good 4-5 years ago, but there's a reason they were cut or not re-signed, b/c they're asking too much. A lot of people might have to eat their position shortages next year and work with what they got and depend on the draft (worked for us).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, that's a lot of years.

 

Most teams tend to lock up the best guys before free agency starts if they can.  What's left over is sometimes half-decent, but some idiot team always overpays early.

 

The smart teams are the ones who sit back, wait for the market to even out, and bargain shop.  The ones who go for the big splash make big offseason headlines and get fans thumping their chests, then they disappear when the actual season starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, that's a lot of years.

 

Most teams tend to lock up the best guys before free agency starts if they can.  What's left over is sometimes half-decent, but some idiot team always overpays early.

 

The smart teams are the ones who sit back, wait for the market to even out, and bargain shop.  The ones who go for the big splash make big offseason headlines and get fans thumping their chests, then they disappear when the actual season starts.

Like us for almost our entire existence. Your philosophy is flawed. The key is just being smart regardless of what you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like us for almost our entire existence. Your philosophy is flawed. The key is just being smart regardless of what you do.

It hasn't been the philosophy that was flawed. It's been the execution.

Gettleman may have taken a similar approach to free agency as Hurney in the timing aspect, but it's clear he knew what he was doing in a way that Hurney never did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hasn't been the philosophy that was flawed. It's been the execution.

Gettleman may have taken a similar approach to free agency as Hurney in the timing aspect, but it's clear he knew what he was doing in a way that Hurney never did.

It's the difference between a scout and a sportswriter making the decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hasn't been the philosophy that was flawed. It's been the execution.

Gettleman may have taken a similar approach to free agency as Hurney in the timing aspect, but it's clear he knew what he was doing in a way that Hurney never did.

It's sort of my point. It's more about the GM than sticking with a certain philosophy. If you have a GM that knows what he's doing, he can sit back and wait or go ahead and get the guys he needs. If you have a GM that doesn't know what he's doing, you have guys like Hurney that sit back and wait but hurt your team. And guys like Snyder than sign everyone regardless and still suck. You can go ahead and sign early as long as you sign the right guys. You don't have to sit back and wait while guys that can help your team get picked up just so you can pride yourself in sticking with your philosophy like Hurney did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...