Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More two tight end sets it is!


CelibatePimp

Recommended Posts

 

"It's a personnel group I believe in. It poses a lot of problems for defensive fronts," head coach Ron Rivera said when asked whether the Panthers might feature more two-tight end sets. "We have a plethora of veteran tight ends to the point where we didn't bring in a rookie. Those six guys are all competing, and all six have NFL experience and an opportunity to contribute to the team.

 

 

"With an extra tight end in the game, you can do so many different things," Rivera said. "Depending on who the tight end is, you can line him up as a fullback, as another wide receiver or as a wing tight end. It's going to give us a lot more versatility with what we do."

 

 

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Panthers-may-feature-more-multiple-TE-sets-/ec359e55-ce92-474c-bcbd-4cc5314e0099

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some where blowing a gasket when we laid back in FA and didn't do much....I for one think that there are things happening on this offense that we are are not privy to ...players developing and ready to step up. Let's wait and see what THEY really have......and not what the dollar bill spent says they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...