Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pete Prisco (CBS Sports Senior NFL Columnist ): I think I was wrong about Kelvin Benjamin


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

comments on KB vs the Pats:

Pete Prisco @PriscoCBS

I think I was wrong about Kelvin Benjamin

Lead National NFL Writer For Bleacher Report Aaron Nagler:

Aaron Nagler @ AaronNagler

I will admit - Kelvin Benjamin looks ten times better than I thought he would this early on.

Assistant Editor for BuffaloBillsDraft.com Joe Marino:

Joe Marino @ TheJoeMarino

Kelvin Benjamin has really looked better than I anticipated he would.

This is what Pete Prisco had to say about the Panthers drafting KB:

"Kelvin Benjamin is a big receiver, but I liked others more...Grade: D"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, mid-way through last season he was my #1 choice and was all the way until Gross retired. Then I lost my way and coveted the position of LT over the guy I wanted.

After the draft my friend said, "you are an idiot. You preach BPA then when your team takes the guy you wanted for five months, a guy who was BPA and at a position of severe need you are worried." He was right

Sent from my XT1049 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB is a guaranteed mismatch on every play.  The elite offenses load up on mismatch players and allow QB’s to make the pre-snap read to go to those guys.  Denver, N.E. and the Saints do this for 4 quarters and put up 30 plus points per game.  I think teams will blanket him all season.  The question is if KB being doubled teamed will open up other aspects of this offense enough to put up points.  If they can do that I think our defense is good enough to put up a bunch of wins again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the solution is to run more 2 TE sets which I have yet to really see.... It should be a staple...

I agree and I think they are saving this for the regular season.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree and I think they are saving this for the regular season.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

I hope so.  I won't be shocked if that's not entirely true though..  This team is set up to run 2 TE sets as a staple offense and it will be a huge shame if used sparingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...