Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Real talk: Who do we get to run the ball next week?


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

 

hi-res-Preview_crop_north.jpg?w=630&h=42

 

 

After hearing what Smitty said in the interview after the game and what the Ravens spoke about in their locker room, I get a better sense of what was discussed behind closed doors.

 

Gettleman in his bumbling stumbling mouth breathing water bottle sucking way told Steve Smith that because he is 35 he is on the decline and there has never been a 35+ year old receiver who has gotten more than 700 yards in a season. So, Gettleman has decided to move in a younger direction for production from the receiver position and believes Smitty would only be a distraction for the team.

 

Then he signs two old WRs who are 32 and 31. But they are not 35 yet, so he guesses they could get over 700 yards in a season.

 

Gettleman cut the heart out from the team and it is starting to show. Horrible eye for talent. No better than flipping a coin. His success rate on players is 50% over his career.

 

I have never hated a GM as much as I hate Gettleman right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it really matter?

I mean we could have AP and we still wouldn't be able to run the ball behind this Oline.

If we sign anybody it should be Richie Incognito.

We got Hardy. Those scenarios are why Ritchie is unemployed presently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go air raid offense

 

Y'know, while I'm pretty sure this was tongue in cheek, it's not a terrible idea.  We cant run the ball well, receivers have been better, spread out with single back and go to a pass heavy offense to set up the run.  This is far to innovative for Shula to ever consider, but it should be on the table.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Y'know, while I'm pretty sure this was tongue in cheek, it's not a terrible idea. We cant run the ball well, receivers have been better, spread out with single back and go to a pass heavy offense to set up the run. This is far to innovative for Shula to ever consider, but it should be on the table.

Only partially tongue and cheek. With this o line I don't know what we can do. Right now my thought is only run to keep teams honest.

Cam will be exposed more, and we will have negative plays, take some sacks, but run game has been mostly fruitless and we have to get points.

I honestly don't know what any OC could do with this o line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...