Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tie math


TN05

Recommended Posts

Since some people here seem to have a hard time understanding ties:

*A tie is half a win, and half a loss.

*When determining tiebreakers, the NFL uses a win-loss-tie win percentage system. Take total of wins and divide by losses (plug in ties as a half-win and half-loss).

*Using the win-loss-tie system, a tie gives us the edge in tiebreaker over a team with the same number of wins. If we finish 9-6-1 (.594 win percentage), we would beat any 9-7 team (.563 win percentage). If we finish 10-5-1 (.656 win percentage), we would beat any (.625 win percentage), and so on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every post about the tie and the related math seems to focus on the positive that we would have that half-game advantage over another team.  It could also bite us in the dick in January and we'll be cussing Ron through the entire off-season.  This wound may not have yet opened.

 

 

Happy Monday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but surprisingly so many people dont have a clue and some even thought it was worse than a loss. thats panthers fans for ya

Lol i know my comment was directed towards the fans who had no clue. Its pretty easy to grasp, just compare % between two records and you would see which is better. Maybe its because I watch soccer that I am able to tell.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one's saying LaMelo has no blame we're responding to you acting like he's the reason they lost. The scapegoating and blaming the teams woes on his personality is where it's like Cam Newton all over again. It was a failure on multiple fronts and primarily Lee's. Dude said ON AIR pregame that they had to protect the paint and if that was his gameplan going in he couldn't have botched it more. As the commentators said Ball's a rhythm guy and Orlando was preventing him for getting any kind of flow going. I'm a normie watching on TV and said they needed to bait them into fouling to combat that. They didn't even try until the 2nd half when it was too late. I think it's fair to expect the star to overcome whatever but LaMelo was not the problem in that game and he's not what is holding the team back. He's the only reason they're flirting with being a great team. I kinda put the center play on Lee too. Moose is great until he's up against a big who can body him. We've always known that and that's what Kalkbrenner is for. I don't know if it would have changed much but Kalkbrenner should have had more minutes than him.  And moving forward with the center position, I just think it's the time to trade Diabate while his stock's high and that's not an indictment of his game. He's like an evolved combination of Biyombo and PJ. He's a great rim protector and the strength issue is just what you're going to have to deal with if you want that. But Kalkbrenner is perfectly capable of protecting the rim and we gotta get away from the undersized centers or it'll always be a problem for us.
    • Honestly its why that Jalen Coker grab was a big deal.  I'd been warming up to the idea of a sadiq pick and was adamantly against a receiver...but this altered my train of thought.  I mean For instance, Cade Otton signed for 3 yr 30 mil contract...thats not dramatically different than the rookie payscale for #19 (4 year 20 mil with 5th year option), however you KNOW otton is decent...no clue if Sadiq will be anything. 
×
×
  • Create New...