Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here's what the garbage time stats tell me.


toldozer

Recommended Posts

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

you make the assumption that Cam and Olsen still want to play for this team... right now it doesnt look like Cam wants to. and Olsen has been obviously frustrated lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

Football games are won/lost at the line of scrimmage.  So yes...improving the O-line will solve a lot of problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

Garbage time stats are called that for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen was the only stud I saw on the field, Cam had moments but also threw into coverage, locked onto receivers and showed poor mobility.

 

Why does it take us getting down by 2+ touchdowns to start targeting our TE?

 

They expect us to target our TE! Go long Cotch!

 

 

lol

 

 

at some point, you just have to laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen was the only stud I saw on the field, Cam had moments but also threw into coverage, locked onto receivers and showed poor mobility.

Why does it take us getting down by 2+ touchdowns to start targeting our TE?

The reason no receivers are open is because we only send 3 against 8 defenders. Teams can get to Cam with 4 guys Olsen and the running backs stay back to block because our offensive line is poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Webb may be our second best receiver, and its not close.

But the Huddle told me all offseason that we were fine at WR! There were some that even said this before we drafted KB

I agree with Webb though. His catch last night was the best by any WR not named KB this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were just discussing this... long bombs to Cotchery.

 

Is that Cam's call or is that the design of the play?  I mean, the DB had him easily beat every single time.

 

I kind of doubt that Newton wants his only viable deep threat to be Jerricho Cotchery at this point, lol.

 

Hell, the only true speed WR we have right now is an undrafted rookie who hasn't even been activated the last few games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
    • Final Avs 9 Wild 6. Defense never entered the building lol.
×
×
  • Create New...