Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Picking 8th vs 21st


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

guys you could get with the 8th pick that were gone before 21:

2000

Brian Urlacher

2001

7× All-Pro OG Steve Hutchinson

2002

Dwight Freeney

Jeremy Shockey

2003

Jordan Gross

Terrell Suggs

Troy Polamalu

2004

Ben Roethlisberger

2005

DeMarcus Ware

2006

Haloti Ngata

Pro Bowl CB Antonio Cromartie

All Pro DE/OLB Tamba Hali

2007

Darrelle Revis

Patrick Willis

Marshawn Lynch

2008

Pro Bowl OT Ryan Clady

Pro Bowl OT Branden Albert

Pro Bowl CB Aqib Talib

Pro Bowl CB Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie

Super Bowl MVP Joe Flacco

2009

Pro Bowl DE Brian Orakpo

WR Jeremy Maclin - 89.1 ypg this yr, already at 1000

2010

Best S in Game Earl Thomas

2011

GOAT J. J. Watt

Cowboys Pro Bowl LT Tyron Smith

All Pro DE Robert Quinn

Patriots LT Nate Solder

2012

Luke Kuechly

2013

Star Lotulelei

2014

Odell Beckham, Jr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One other point is do you want to pick 21st in the 2nd round or 8th in the 2nd round???   

Once you get into the second round it really doesn't matter. Just for fun I compared picks #40 to #53 and 53 has probably produced the better players at least for the last decade. We picked Silatolu at #40 for the record. Lesean McCoy was picked at #53. Still some great players at both spots. If you go back far enough #40 has a couple of probowlers.

 

For just about every pick out there you see some guy 5 spots down that everyone passed on.

 

It's about picking the right player not the number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me for not reading the post after the first couple...It's thanksgiving after all!

 

When you are drafting 8, you stand a much better chance of getting the more highly regarded OTs versus 21.  Like what we saw this year.

 

The long and short of the whole deal is about picking the right players.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all the folks who want to tank the season to secure a high draft pick I thought I would look at the difference between 8th where we are now and 21st where we could pick if we somehow win the division. I was surprised at the results:

2007

8th - DE Jamaal Anderson (out of the league)

21st - S Reggie Nelson (still in league may have shot someone)

2008

8th - DE Derrick Harvey (out of the league)

21st - OT Sam Baker (often injured still active)

2009

8th - OT Eugene Monroe (solid OT)

21st - C Alex Mack (pro bowler)

2010

8th - LB Rolando McCain (released by the Raiders for being to crazy, retired edit: unretired and playing well)

21st - TE Jermaine Gresham (pro bowler)

2011

8th - QB Jake Locker (above average QB watching Mettenberger play)

21st - DE Phil Taylor (rookie standout declined from there)

2012

8th - QB Ryan Tannehill (good QB with further potential)

21st - DE Chandler Jones (starting DE/LB for New England with 22 career sacks)

2013

8th - WR Tavon Austin (600 yards in 2 seasons; he's no Lafell)

21st - TE Tyler Eifert (Ok rookie season now on IR)

2014

8th - CB Justin Gilbert (currently sitting the bench but future potential)

21st - S Ha Ha Clinton-Dix (starting S in Green Bay)

We'll be taking an OT there. Historically top 10 pick OT seem to be a pretty safe pick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once you get into the second round it really doesn't matter. Just for fun I compared picks #40 to #53 and 53 has probably produced the better players at least for the last decade. We picked Silatolu at #40 for the record. Lesean McCoy was picked at #53. Still some great players at both spots. If you go back far enough #40 has a couple of probowlers.

 

For just about every pick out there you see some guy 5 spots down that everyone passed on.

 

It's about picking the right player not the number.

 

Using Marty Hurney's picks after the first round as a basis for your argument generally isn't a good idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather than looking at who was picked 8th and 21st, you should look at all the players that were taken between 8 and 21.  Its senseless to argue that there really isn't a difference between 8 and 21, because there is and its big. 

 

Hoping your 3-7-1 team ends up with a top 10 pick doesn't make you a 'bad' fan as some would suggest.  On the contrary, it's hope that we can fill glaring holes with studs that will wear a Panther uniform for the next decade or so (i.e. Gross).  We even have a chance at getting first round talent in the second round if we pick in the top third. 

 

If the Panthers were competitive and had a shot at making a run in the playoffs, everybody would be on board.  However, as of today, it doesn't appear that any NFC South team has a chance of making a run in the playoffs.  Instead, it's more about who will lose the fewest games vs. who will make a run.  If the scenario is that we limp into the playoffs solely because the NFC South sucks and get blown out first round by the wild card team ... yes, I would rather have the 8th pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely an interesting discussion, nice job HP.

I would think the main difference between 8 & 21 is that at 8 you can generally get a great prospect at whatever position is your greatest need whereas at 21 you'd be better served taking BPA. You can still get top notch talent anywhere in Rnd1...

I would argue it makes more difference in the later rounds overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather than looking at who was picked 8th and 21st, you should look at all the players that were taken between 8 and 21. Its senseless to argue that there really isn't a difference between 8 and 21, because there is and its big.

Hoping your 3-7-1 team ends up with a top 10 pick doesn't make you a 'bad' fan as some would suggest. On the contrary, it's hope that we can fill glaring holes with studs that will wear a Panther uniform for the next decade or so (i.e. Gross). We even have a chance at getting first round talent in the second round if we pick in the top third.

If the Panthers were competitive and had a shot at making a run in the playoffs, everybody would be on board. However, as of today, it doesn't appear that any NFC South team has a chance of making a run in the playoffs. Instead, it's more about who will lose the fewest games vs. who will make a run. If the scenario is that we limp into the playoffs solely because the NFC South sucks and get blown out first round by the wild card team ... yes, I would rather have the 8th pick.

Why the fug couldn't we make a run? The Lions here who we already beat and a road trip to an injury ravaged Arizona team with a backup QB? For all we know we could end up back at BOA for the NFCCG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the fug couldn't we make a run? The Lions here who we already beat and a road trip to an injury ravaged Arizona team with a backup QB? For all we know we could end up back at BOA for the NFCCG.

 

IMHO ... Shula, Rivera and our OL is why.  Don't see it happening but if we get hot and make a big push, then GREAT.  I am all in and will travel to playoff games if necessary.  Still trying to figure out who will be playing RT next week on an already porous OL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...