Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI Most Disappointing - Star


unicar15

Recommended Posts

http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/12/23/most-disappointing-2014-nfl-jay-cutler-doug-martin?page=2&devicetype=phone

Stars lack of tackles and sacks lands him here. Hard to measure success at his position tho. The LBs he is tasked with keeping clean were both almost pro bowlers and KK had a superb year getting to the QB. So...if he's playing the NT in our D I gauge his success more by unit success than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Star does an alright job clogging the middle he does sometimes beat his man or men off the ball and gets into the backfield in a hurry he just hasn't been able to make a play. What you don't get with star are those splash plays that KK gets. It is only his 2nd season and remember most DTs take a couple years to get into their prime

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hooray for SI doing their homework.  Oh, wait...

 

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/12/18/5393978/star-lotulelei-struggling-in-2nd.html

 

 

Lotulelei rolled his ankle in the Week 10 loss to Philadelphia and missed the next two games. But that hasn’t been the sole cause of his less-than-desirable season.

Panthers coach Ron Rivera pointed to Carolina’s moving Lotulelei around this season as part of the reason his numbers aren’t up. The team has used him as a tackle over the offensive guard and a nose tackle lined up over center.

“At defensive tackle you’re going to have the games where there aren’t a lot of plays for you to make,” fellow tackle Dwan Edwards said. “He’s been in position to make some big plays and maybe someone else didn’t do their job. It’s tough because you need everyone working together for you to be successful, and sometimes it just doesn’t happen.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest problem for Star was not having Hardy next to him. You had to double Hardy which meant Star was singled most of last year. With Hardy gone teams could double Star and neutralize him. Imagine what we would have had if Hardy joined Star, Short and Johnson this year. At least one if not as many as three of them could have been playing at a probowl level. The lack of push by our DEs for much of the early season were a big reason why our secondary was so poor. That and the overall lack of speed along and poor tackling were a recipe for disaster. Our tackles were susceptible to losing gap integrity in an attempt to pressure the play and instead give up a big run play up the middle. We gave up so many big plays on third down where last year we were shutting them down. It took players like Benwikere and Boston to come in and set an aggressive tone to challenge the veterans to step up their game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...