Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football Outsiders Defense Stats Confirm LB Awesomeness


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

Voth linked to this article this morning and I found it interesting but not surprising.

Some of Luke's detractors like to clamor that he doesn't make plays behind the LOS and he just gets his numbers once the play has been made. We, those who know what a football is, know better and here is some statistical evidence that supports what we already knew.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/extra-points/2015/jj-watt-and-lavonte-david-lead-nfl-2014-defeats

Most Defeats, 2014

Player Team Pos Passes Runs Total

J.J. Watt HOU DE 26 17 43

Lavonte David TB OLB 19 23 42

DeAndre Levy DET OLB 22 14 36

Justin Houston KC OLB 25 8 33

C.J. Mosley BAL ILB 18 12 30

Connor Barwin PHI OLB 20 8 28

Luke Kuechly CAR ILB 16 12 28

Jason Pierre-Paul NYG DE 19 8 27

Lawrence Timmons PIT ILB 12 15 27

Carlos Dunlap CIN DE 15 11 26

Ndamukong Suh DET DT 13 13 26

Khalil Mack OAK OLB 8 17 25

Mario Williams BUF DE 18 7 25

Ezekiel Ansah DET DE 12 12 24

Thomas Davis CAR OLB 16 8 24

Aaron Donald STL DT 12 12 24

What is a defeat?

The last few years, we've written a lot about a stat called Defeats that we use to count big plays made by defensive players. Defeats add up the following types of plays:

a) All tackles for a loss, including sacks;

B) Any tackle or pass defensed to prevent a conversion on third or fourth down;

c) Any turnover or a batted pass that leads to an interception.

So, they're as badass as we thought.

Suck it haters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly can't think of anyone who hates on Luke or Thomas. Maybe I missed something but all I ever hear is praise from every analyst and player around the league.

I think he was referring to that guy on the huddle who said Luke just gets his stats from jumping on piles and doesn't make plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...