Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lesson Learned


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Everyone is buzzing about the "worst play call in NFL history" this morning, and I have to agree the call was terrible. Looking deeper into it, I feel there is a lesson that can be taken away from Seattle's misery. It is a simple notion, but one that the Carolina Panthers and many other NFL teams have lost sight of at times.

 

If you cannot impose your will at the most critical time, you don't deserve to win.

 

I understand Seattle's thinking in the situation. New England was in their goal line defense and appeared ready to sell out and stop the run. A seemingly reasonable option then would be to throw the ball. Unfortunately for Seattle, the old saying "Three things can happen when you throw the ball, and two of them are bad" rang true.

 

Seattle forgot that they were the team marching down the field. They were the team one yard away from a Superbowl victory. They were the ones that had New England against the ropes, waiting for a knockout punch.

 

And then... they flinched. They doubted themselves and their ability to impose a one yard run in three tries. Even with Marshawn Lynch. Even with Russell Wilson. They doubted their own resolve, and it cost them the game.

 

Losers take what is given. Winners impose their will and take what is theirs. Sometimes the game really does come down to who wants it more, and last night the Seahawks became complacent at the worst possible moment.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

 

I'm sure there are many YouTube videos out.  Anyway, I would've ran something pretty simple but not as straightforward as giving it to Lynch.  For instance, running a TE or a DT up the middle like the Jets did vs us last year.  Don't pass the ball with a game manager in a pressure situation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

Revis also said they expected the run. It was a semi disguised goal line with 3 corners.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a valid point and it's surprising given their reliance on Lynch and his ability to pretty much get 4 yards every time he touches the ball.

 

One of the worst decisions in football history imo.

 

Herm Edwards on Mike & Mike this morning seems to think personnel dictated that RW could have ran the read option, kept it wand walked in...  armchair QB's...ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he would've scored it would go down as one of the greatest plays in SB history.

This!!! About a million times!!! I understand their thinking, but with your personnel it is odd they passed. Butler made a great play. He jumped the route. If he don't get their at the moment he did. TOUCHDOWN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it was the deciding play in the super bowl it will always be hyped as worst play call in history.  I don't have a problem with passing on that down with two downs to go but the inside slant when the back line of the defense is all flowing to collapse toward the center?

 

If you are going to pass in that situation use the play call the Pats did, twice,  (one worked, one did not) with Amendola making a sweet inside fake and arm push to outside.  If you miss that route much less chance of a disaster.

 

Now you have a play call that takes away from what should rightly be called the most incredible, clutch reception in Superbowl history.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...