Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lesson Learned


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Everyone is buzzing about the "worst play call in NFL history" this morning, and I have to agree the call was terrible. Looking deeper into it, I feel there is a lesson that can be taken away from Seattle's misery. It is a simple notion, but one that the Carolina Panthers and many other NFL teams have lost sight of at times.

 

If you cannot impose your will at the most critical time, you don't deserve to win.

 

I understand Seattle's thinking in the situation. New England was in their goal line defense and appeared ready to sell out and stop the run. A seemingly reasonable option then would be to throw the ball. Unfortunately for Seattle, the old saying "Three things can happen when you throw the ball, and two of them are bad" rang true.

 

Seattle forgot that they were the team marching down the field. They were the team one yard away from a Superbowl victory. They were the ones that had New England against the ropes, waiting for a knockout punch.

 

And then... they flinched. They doubted themselves and their ability to impose a one yard run in three tries. Even with Marshawn Lynch. Even with Russell Wilson. They doubted their own resolve, and it cost them the game.

 

Losers take what is given. Winners impose their will and take what is theirs. Sometimes the game really does come down to who wants it more, and last night the Seahawks became complacent at the worst possible moment.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

 

I'm sure there are many YouTube videos out.  Anyway, I would've ran something pretty simple but not as straightforward as giving it to Lynch.  For instance, running a TE or a DT up the middle like the Jets did vs us last year.  Don't pass the ball with a game manager in a pressure situation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

Revis also said they expected the run. It was a semi disguised goal line with 3 corners.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a valid point and it's surprising given their reliance on Lynch and his ability to pretty much get 4 yards every time he touches the ball.

 

One of the worst decisions in football history imo.

 

Herm Edwards on Mike & Mike this morning seems to think personnel dictated that RW could have ran the read option, kept it wand walked in...  armchair QB's...ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he would've scored it would go down as one of the greatest plays in SB history.

This!!! About a million times!!! I understand their thinking, but with your personnel it is odd they passed. Butler made a great play. He jumped the route. If he don't get their at the moment he did. TOUCHDOWN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it was the deciding play in the super bowl it will always be hyped as worst play call in history.  I don't have a problem with passing on that down with two downs to go but the inside slant when the back line of the defense is all flowing to collapse toward the center?

 

If you are going to pass in that situation use the play call the Pats did, twice,  (one worked, one did not) with Amendola making a sweet inside fake and arm push to outside.  If you miss that route much less chance of a disaster.

 

Now you have a play call that takes away from what should rightly be called the most incredible, clutch reception in Superbowl history.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was checking out Chris Brazzell II measureables, and I thought they looked suspiciously familiar. Turns out it was true, almost identical measureables to former Panthers DJ Chark circa 2023. I even checked Terrace Marshall Jr results, and honestly isn't that far behind them.   I know this isn't unique for just our team, but we seem to specifically have an obsession with trying to make this tall lanky speedsters work for us. I admittedly wasn't that high on Brazzell, and when I watched the tape I didn't really see that 4.3 speed, and a strong wind seems to tackle him.   I really liked most of the draft, including getting Hecht in the 5th when I graded him as a #1 Center in this draft. I'm rooting for the guy to work out, especially since our HC and OC made their bones as Wide Receiver coaches. But Brazzell is the only one I'm kinda meh on. I was hoping we'd trade up to get Big Citrus, or if we went WR I liked Ted Hurst much better. We'll see though. 3rd rounders seem to be coin-flips for us (see DJ Johnson/Matt Corral). But I'm rooting for the guy and for this experiment to finally pay off.   I haven't seen anyone else post something about this, so just thought it was interesting and passing it along.   #keeppounding   -------------------------------------------------------------- AI Overview   Chris Brazzell II and D.J. Chark both possess nearly identical elite deep-threat profiles, highlighted by their tall, lanky builds and blazing sub-4.40 speed. Chark was slightly faster, while Brazzell offers a marginally heavier frame and longer wingspan. [1, 2, 3, 4] The side-by-side physical and athletic testing results from their respective NFL Scouting Combines outline their comparable profiles: [1] Metric [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] D.J. Chark (2018) Chris Brazzell II (2026) Height 6'3" 6'4" Weight 199 lbs 198 lbs Wingspan 78.5" 80.1" 40-Yard Dash 4.34 seconds 4.37 seconds 10-Yard Split ~1.50s (est.) 1.52 seconds Vertical Jump 40.0" 40.0" (pre-draft) Hand Size 9.25" 9.0" Analytical Comparison Size & Build: Both receivers offer an excellent catch radius with lanky, outside-threat frames. Brazzell holds a slight edge in height and an even more significant advantage in wingspan, giving him a massive target radius. Speed Profile: Chark famously recorded the fastest 40-yard dash time at his combine, while Brazzell was a standout at his event. Both times are elite for their size, translating directly to the "field-stretching" and vertical playmaking abilities that define their games. Draft Status: Chark was selected by the Jacksonville Jaguars in the second round (61st overall) of the 2018 Draft. Brazzell was selected by the Carolina Panthers in the third round (83rd overall) of the 2026 NFL Draft.
    • I still reserve my right to bitch about how incompetent the Panthers are at running a football organization and point to the mountains of evidence in support.
×
×
  • Create New...