Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lesson Learned


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Everyone is buzzing about the "worst play call in NFL history" this morning, and I have to agree the call was terrible. Looking deeper into it, I feel there is a lesson that can be taken away from Seattle's misery. It is a simple notion, but one that the Carolina Panthers and many other NFL teams have lost sight of at times.

 

If you cannot impose your will at the most critical time, you don't deserve to win.

 

I understand Seattle's thinking in the situation. New England was in their goal line defense and appeared ready to sell out and stop the run. A seemingly reasonable option then would be to throw the ball. Unfortunately for Seattle, the old saying "Three things can happen when you throw the ball, and two of them are bad" rang true.

 

Seattle forgot that they were the team marching down the field. They were the team one yard away from a Superbowl victory. They were the ones that had New England against the ropes, waiting for a knockout punch.

 

And then... they flinched. They doubted themselves and their ability to impose a one yard run in three tries. Even with Marshawn Lynch. Even with Russell Wilson. They doubted their own resolve, and it cost them the game.

 

Losers take what is given. Winners impose their will and take what is theirs. Sometimes the game really does come down to who wants it more, and last night the Seahawks became complacent at the worst possible moment.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

 

I'm sure there are many YouTube videos out.  Anyway, I would've ran something pretty simple but not as straightforward as giving it to Lynch.  For instance, running a TE or a DT up the middle like the Jets did vs us last year.  Don't pass the ball with a game manager in a pressure situation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have Carroll saying they were in goal line defense, but then you have Revis post game saying they were in a three corner package ( some sort of goal line nickel) and not a true goal line set.

Sounds to me like Carroll is just making excuses for the dumbshit play call.

I need to watch the play again for myself. The highlights just focus on the int and I can't see the entire defensive set.

Revis also said they expected the run. It was a semi disguised goal line with 3 corners.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a valid point and it's surprising given their reliance on Lynch and his ability to pretty much get 4 yards every time he touches the ball.

 

One of the worst decisions in football history imo.

 

Herm Edwards on Mike & Mike this morning seems to think personnel dictated that RW could have ran the read option, kept it wand walked in...  armchair QB's...ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he would've scored it would go down as one of the greatest plays in SB history.

This!!! About a million times!!! I understand their thinking, but with your personnel it is odd they passed. Butler made a great play. He jumped the route. If he don't get their at the moment he did. TOUCHDOWN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it was the deciding play in the super bowl it will always be hyped as worst play call in history.  I don't have a problem with passing on that down with two downs to go but the inside slant when the back line of the defense is all flowing to collapse toward the center?

 

If you are going to pass in that situation use the play call the Pats did, twice,  (one worked, one did not) with Amendola making a sweet inside fake and arm push to outside.  If you miss that route much less chance of a disaster.

 

Now you have a play call that takes away from what should rightly be called the most incredible, clutch reception in Superbowl history.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...