Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Randell Cobb


Malt Liquor

Recommended Posts

I've been holding off on looking at upcoming possible free agents. Doesn't make much sense to spend all that energy on guys that may not even be available.

March 10 can't get here fast enough.

Trying to rush thru black history month already IGo... :-) :-)......:smh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we go for any "big-ticket FA" the ONLY possible one I could see us going for is JPP (G-man loves his pass rushers and knows what JPP can do first-hand). None of the top WRs warrant a contract that they'll demand, there's no really good FA tackles and we're not going to spend any big bucks on a safety or CB. I see it as a 5% chance we pursue JPP and no chance we even go after any of the other big money guys on the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those interested in Torrey Smith, I can give you these bits and pieces--

 

He was offered a 5-year, $35m contract at the beginning of the season and did not take it---Then, he had a down year, FWIW.

He said he wants to return to Baltimore, but there is some sense he is going to test the waters to gauge his worth.

 

I think $7m per season is probably where he will be--more than that is a #1.  (Coincidentally, it is where another WR names Smith was).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No point talking about FAs that teams ain't gonna let leave. GB isn't parting with him

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Green Bay already extended Jordy Nelson and is paying him big money. Last year they drafted Devante Adams in the 2nd round as a potential 'next man up' once Cobb was due for a big deal and he played well this season. I'm not so sure the Packers invest that much money in their #2 when they just drafted a receiver last year to be his potential replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the Packers do let him go, which I doubt, he'd be way too expensive to be on our radar. He's the definition of "shopping at Tiffany's" this offseason. Guys like Cecil Shorts and Denarius Moore are much more likely to be in our price range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No point talking about FAs that teams ain't gonna let leave. GB isn't parting with him

Can't see him leaving either. The Packers are in a decent position with their cap space to bring him back, but perhaps a sticking point could be price and whether they are willing to pay it?

Apparently he wants to at least match what Decker got from the Jets ($36 million, 5yr), and they recently signed Nelson to a new deal ($39 million, 4yr). If they can get him at $7 million a year, they should bring him back. However, at $9 million (or more) they may decide to not pay that amount of money to two WRs, or they may not want to pay Cobb more than their star receiver, Jordy Nelson.

Like you, I don't think Cobb is going anywhere. Him and Nelson combine as one of the best duos in the league. I can't imagine they want to let go of a 24 year old heading into his prime years. But i suppose it wouldn't be too surprising to see one of the big name receivers hit free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...