Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Greg Hardy won't be reinstated because he hasn't been disciplined yet


Montsta

Recommended Posts

A year off WITH pay is NOT really a punishment.

They told him to either go on the Commissioners List with pay.....or be suspended. Hardy chose the CL.

Technicality.

But it seems that your argument is that since it wasn't the harshest penalty they could have evoked, it wasn't punishment at all. He had a choice of two punishments, and he chose the lesser of the two. That doesn't mean it isn't punishment

That is nonsense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying the NFL needs a court sentencing to punish people. What we are saying here is that the reason any disciplinary process was started at all was an allegation of which charges to that have since been dismissed.

 

But you (and others) are refusing to grasp that there was enough evidence for a judge to find him guilty.  Even though she did have a conflict of interest and should have recused herself from the trial, the fact that evidence was presented and a judge said guilt IS MORE THAN ENOUGH eveidence for the NFL to take a close look into what was presented.....even though the guilty verdict is superceded by a trial by jury.

 

Is Hardy guilty of everything that Holder accused him of?  Probably not.

 

Is Hardy completely innocent and did nothign wrong that night?  Probably not.

 

Will he be punished by the league?  Very likely....but I am willing to bet it is not 6 games.  More likely 2-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technicality.

 

But it seems that your argument is that sense it wasn't the harshest penalty the could have evoked, it wasn't punishment at all.  He had a choice of two punishments, and he chose the lesser of the two.  That doesn't mean it isn't punishment

 

That is nonsense

 

I understand what you are saying and do agree with you to an extent.  But, when the punishment would normally be 4-6 games without pay and he got 13 games WITH pay.  It is still not much of a punishment at all.

 

Not to mention that he was already playing under the Franchise Tag....which players hate.  Always a risk for injury.

 

13 games off with pay (no risk of injury) is much better than 6 games suspended without pay and then 7 games playing under a 1 year deal.

 

And it is "since"....not "sense".  :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they can. They just did with Peterson. Are you this slow? Hardy did agree to be put on it but he really had no other choice because if he said no he'd have just been suspended indefinitely.

NFL players have to consent and agree to be placed on it. They can resist if they want. Hardy believed that was his best option.

I'm just stating fact about the list

He likely agreed to it bc it secured him a paid vacation instead of facing you know.....punsihment of losing game day checks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying the NFL needs a court sentencing to punish people. What we are saying here is that the reason any disciplinary process was started at all was an allegation of which charges to that have since been dismissed.

Ben Roethlisberger, 6 game suspension after the DA dropped the charges. It happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, if you follow what Hardy did while away it sounds like one hell of an extended vacation. Miami, music video, parties, etc.

You're a parent right?

You don't get to see your wife and kids grow up for an entire year. An entire year of precious time with them is taken away from you.

During that time you'll get paid though.

Is that punishment?

If you say no you should show that to your wife and kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a parent right?

You don't get to see your wife and kids grow up for an entire year. An entire year of precious time with them is taken away from you.

During that time you'll get paid though.

Is that punishment?

If you say no you should show that to your wife and kids.

Did you just try to compare...eh...nevermind. Even I won't tangle with that logic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a parent right?

You don't get to see your wife and kids grow up for an entire year. An entire year of precious time with them is taken away from you.

During that time you'll get paid though.

Is that punishment?

If you say no you should show that to your wife and kids.

Camon man thats way different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. The Panthers were punished, not Hardy.

Best case scenario now for the Panthers is for Hardy to avoid suspension, cash in on a bug time contract elsewhere, and give the Panthers a 3rd round 2016 pick.

Elsewhere being out of this division. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you just try to compare...eh...nevermind. Even I won't tangle with that logic

Nah the argument is if you get paid it isn't a punishment.

Everyone else is arguing losing time isn't the punishment. This is to clearly demonstrate that Hardy was punished with losing time he can never get back.

It's funny that YOU are the one talking about terrible logic. That's your bread and butter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...