Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Color is the Dress?

Captroop

By Captroop,
in Huddle Lounge

Dress Color  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. What colors do you see?

    • Black/Blue
      14
    • White/Gold
      7

Recommended Posts

Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

Okay, so this picture has been making the rounds on the Interwebs today.

 

tumblr_nkcjuq8Tdr1tnacy1o1_500.jpg

 

Basically, there is a huge division on what colors people see when they see the dress, and they're radically different. So I put the question to all of you: Do you see Blue and Black? Or are you wrong and generally suck at life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RelaxImaPro Enthusiast

RelaxImaPro

Posted
Posted

You clicked on the thread, smart guy.

 

 

..Typical White/Gold douche, amiright?

 

That's actually pretty funny considering your signature.

 

But as for the dress, yeah, it's blue and black in real life:

 

grid-cell-25148-1425000934-2.jpg

 

That's a picture of the actual dress without any sort of lighting effects.

 

It's an optical illusion created by their minds to compensate for the contrast of the bright light in the background and somehow has some perceiving it as white and gold.  Apparently, from my understanding, it's their minds trying to fill in blanks that aren't actually there.

 

But as for the the original picture, I don't know how any of you fugers are seeing white/gold or black/blue.  You take a sample from the actual picture as projected from your computer monitor and it's lavender/brown:

 

RsvSM5N.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That's actually pretty funny considering your signature.

 

But as for the dress, yeah, it's blue and black in real life:

 

grid-cell-25148-1425000934-2.jpg

 

That's a picture of the actual dress without any sort of lighting effects.

 

It's an optical illusion created by their minds to compensate for the contrast of the bright light in the background and somehow has some perceiving it as white and gold.  Apparently, from my understanding, it's their minds trying to fill in blanks that aren't actually there.

 

But as for the the original picture, I don't know how any of you fugers are seeing white/gold or black/blue.  You take a sample from the actual picture as projected from your computer monitor and it's lavender/brown:

 

RsvSM5N.jpg

 

You mean my gif of the black and blue power ranger?

 

But yeah, what's surprising is that world-wide, something like 75% of the viewers fall for the illusion and see white/gold. Pretty interesting.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
  • Author
Posted

smh talking about dresses on a football forum..whats next you all going to talk about the time of the month and what maxi pads you use?

  1.  It's about optical illusions, not dresses.
  2. This isn't the football portion of the forum.
  3. You're an embarrassment to manhood.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

i got stuck at mcdonalds early this morning waiting for the roads to thaw out a little and watched what they had on tv...the today show. first time i had watched anything like that in years, and they were talking about this being the big discussion and how seriously people were taking this debate.

 

it makes me thankful for every moment i seperate myself from social media.

 

it's unbelieveable how dumb people can be.

 

 

 

i mean it was obvious it's blue and black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Round 1: The Carolina Panthers select OT Monroe Freeling (Georgia)

      By MHS831 · Posted

      When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • MHS831
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • 45catfan
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By 45catfan · Posted

      Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...