Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Final Decision On Hardy : No Thanks

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

The team that won the Super Bowl this year traded away a pro bowler at the start of the season.

Likewise, teams like the Steelers have let plenty of big name free agents walk.

If you build well, you can afford to be picky.

The notion that dumping Hardy dooms us to mediocrity is just unfounded.

 

Steelers have always struggled on the offensive side of the ball because of that. Not only that but in all honesty the Steelers have had the privilege of having a HOF DC for well over a decade. I can almost promise you that the Steelers will fire Mike Tomlin in a year or two because he will not have Dick Lebeau to pick up for his slack. Also your other example is misleading because everyone knew Logan Mankins was not at a pro bowl level anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

Those teams have good coaches and competent owners though. We have neither.

 

We have a top GM and a solid coach. We got to the divisional round last year after losing 2 pro bowlers and other important key players and actually gaining no pro bowlers. Not sure why fellas here want to keep complaining even when we as Panthers fans have a lot to be excited about.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Attacking my sobriety to distract from attacking Hardy constantly? Are you denying you take pleasure in character assassinating him every chance you get or not? This is about you and your constant need to bash Hardy.

 

 

Show me where I bashed Hardy in this thread, or this year for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doc LRB
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By Doc LRB · Posted

      Thanks Rayzor,will do!  
    • Doc LRB
      Breakout 2025 Candidates

      By Doc LRB · Posted

      https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...