Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A girl with...history


Lumps

Recommended Posts

Can't quote you because you quoted so many people but I think you listed the first girl first because you like her best, just my hunch.  That's what I'd do if I was ranking women I was seeing, list the one I liked best first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if i was in your situation and forced to choose, it'd be the intellectual one, hands down. intellectual curiosity is an extremely important component of a relationship for me, and things like sex are amplified by the chemistry of the mind. things like looks become similarly amplified; a decent looking girl becomes hot as fug once you realize she's smart as hell and you'll never get bored of her.

 

but montsta is right. don't settle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm already going crazy trying to figure this out. Believe me, part of me is just wanting to say fug it and leave them all. But at the same time does such thing exist? Attractive and exited about a future, intellectual compatibility and great sex? It seems too good to be true. I've been with a lot of girls and my routine is becoming very old...I've never come across all three, seems impossible.

 

 

Yes, it exists.

Also, the fact that what you consider one to be intellectual, yet she isn't smart enough to figure out you're nailing two other chicks tells me something. You don't marry a girl you meet at the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a scale of 1-10, how attractive are they all?

If they are close on the scale, the intellectual one wins easily, but this sort of thing is important in choosing.

If the first is a 9, but the other two are 5s, then I think it is clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...