Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cowboys in negotiations with Greg Hardy?


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

How? They didnt have the money to sign Murray but they have money to sign Hardy?

 

They had the money to sign Murray, but didn't want to pay him what he wanted.

 

 

Hardy is likely to come cheap(er) than expected, probably on a short-term deal.

 

They've got $8m in cap space and can open up another $8m by designating CB Brandon Carr as a post-June 1 cut if they need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no suspension, letter of apology from goodell, one of those chocolate dipped fruit baskets you see advertised on TV coming to greg hardy's front door soon

I think he really like one of those. Strangely the fruit is really juicy and the chocolate complements nicely. He should thank whoever sends him one. They are kinda expensive too. But he sure will enjoy it. Just don't let it melt Greg! Then it gets messy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don't care if he goes to the Cowboys. At least not in the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How? They didnt have the money to sign Murray but they have money to sign Hardy?

 

At this point Hardy is probably looking at a 1yr deal that won't break the bank.  No team wants to spend a bunch of money on a player with the kind of baggage he has.  Especially after the Ray Rice fiasco.  Rice's career looks like it's over, and Hardy is struggling to find a new home.  He's too talented not to sign somewhere but no one is "backing up the Brinks truck" like he said after the 2013 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...